“Give advice; if people don't listen, let adversity teach them.”
— Ethiopian proverb
COVID-19 is largely transmitted inside homes and other buildings, but they need not endanger us: with my technology, we can be much safer indoors than outdoors.
Introducing AirPixel™ technology: Active intelligent air vectoring to control airborne pathogen propagation
First, why? Researchers discovered that COVID-19 can “trigger self-attacking antibodies … even among people who had mild symptoms or no symptoms at all.” This is one of the many reasons why it is a colossal mistake to trivialize this pandemic and to not do everything possible to quickly control it. Just as school shooters damage people and property, autoantibodies damage cells and tissues throughout your body, affecting your brain, heart, and elsewhere. As discussed in the text and videos below, scientists have evidence that this lowers IQ and sparks multiple problems that result in reduced lifespan. Another alarming outcome that develops in a surprising percentage of COVID-19 patients: “the coronavirus may cause fat cells to miscommunicate, leading to diabetes.” And possibly erectile dysfunction.
Alarmingly, scientists reported that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein activates human endogenous retroviruses that “are now known to be responsible for many human diseases.” Connect that dot with this: “All current vaccines that are authorized for general use and for which clinical efficacy data have been published rely on the viral spike protein (S) as an immunogen …”
Scott Davison, CEO of OneAmerica insurance company, said the insurance industry is witnessing an “uptick” in disability claims and an unprecedented upsurge in death rates, 40% greater than they were pre-pandemic. He said “a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So, 40% is just unheard of …”
Charlie Kirk said “nobody knows” why this is happening, but the preceding two paragraphs present educated guesses and highlight the imperative to quickly solve this mystery. Occam's razor (a.k.a. the principle of parsimony) says it is — directly or indirectly — COVID-19 or its spike protein (ironic that the spike in deaths results from the spike protein). If so, that will require rethinking how we manage this pandemic, such as by using my technology to block airborne pathogen transmission. Kirk added that “everyone missed this” spike in death rates, including insurance industry actuaries, but I predicted it much earlier in the pandemic, basing that projection on past research linking infections to accelerated aging and reduced lifespan (example), some of which I discussed in the 63-minute video posted below.
- March 7, 2022: SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank
- March 7, 2022: Even mild COVID-19 can damage the brain, affecting a person's ability to perform complex tasks, study finds
- March 8, 2022: Brain changes after COVID revealed by imaging: Imaging before and after infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus reveals substantial changes in the brain after infection.
- March 10, 2022: COVID ups risks of dementia, cognitive impairment, and decline in older survivors: The study, which followed survivors for a year, suggests dementia could rise worldwide.
- April 1, 2022: Study shows COVID-19's lingering impacts on the brain: Researchers found severe brain inflammation and injury consistent with reduced blood flow or oxygen to the brain, including neuron damage and death
- April 19, 2022: COVID-19 pneumonia increases dementia risk: Study examined nearly 10,500 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia
- May 3, 2022: Covid-19 news: Cognitive impairment equivalent to 20 years of ageing
Excerpt: “People hospitalised with covid-19 may lose 10 IQ points, equivalent to the natural cognitive decline that occurs between 50 and 70 years old … Covid-19 can cause lasting cognitive and mental health issues …”
- May 4, 2022: Nearly 13 percent of COVID-19 hospitalized patients had serious neurologic symptoms, study finds
Based on: Neurologic Manifestations of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic
- May 18, 2022: Viral infections during pregnancy affect maternal care behavior
Excerpt: “Viral infections during pregnancy affect the mother's brain and her postpartum care behavior.”
Based on: Gestational immune activation disrupts hypothalamic neurocircuits of maternal care behavior
- Olga Khazan in The Atlantic March 30, 2022: Why People Are Acting So Weird: Crime, “unruly passenger” incidents, and other types of strange behavior have all soared recently. Why?
Comment: See above.
- February 16, 2022: Pandemics disable people — the history lesson that policymakers ignore: Influenza, polio and more have shown that infections can change lives even decades later. Why the complacency over possible long-term effects of COVID-19?
- Be aware of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: There is more than meets the eye
Excerpt: “… the spike protein by itself (without being part of the corona virus) can damage endothelial cells and disrupt the blood-brain barrier. These findings may be even more relevant to the pathogenesis of long-COVID syndrome that may affect as many as 50% of those infected with SARS-CoV-2.”
- The novel coronavirus' spike protein plays additional key role in illness: Salk researchers and collaborators show how the protein damages cells, confirming COVID-19 as a primarily vascular disease
Based on: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2
- Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Alone Can Cause Damage to Lungs
- March 17, 2022: How coronavirus triggers immune response in brain
Excerpt: “A new study describes how the spike protein used by the coronavirus to enter human cells can have a similar effect on the brain's immune cells as it does with the rest of the body.”
- SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro
- An evidence that SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 spike protein (SP) damages hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in the mechanism of pyroptosis in Nlrp3 inflammasome-dependent manner
- SARS-CoV-2 Spike Proteins Disrupt the Blood-Brain Barrier, Potentially Raising Risk of Neurological Damage in COVID-19 Patients
- New research: Besides initiating infection, coronavirus spike protein has key role in illness
- Research finds Covid-19 spike protein binds to cells in the heart and could help to explain some effects of severe infection
- The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein disrupts human cardiac pericytes function through CD147 receptor-mediated signalling: a potential non-infective mechanism of COVID-19 microvascular disease
- February 9, 2022: Risk of new heart problems jumps after COVID …
Excerpt: “Risk of new heart problems much higher after COVID recovery … An average of one year after their recovery from the acute phase of the infection, the COVID-19 survivors had a 63% higher risk for heart attack, a 69% higher risk for problematic irregular heart rhythm, a 52% higher risk of stroke, a 72% higher risk of heart failure, and a nearly three times higher risk of a potentially fatal blood clot in the lungs …”
Based on: Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19
Excerpt: “We show that, beyond the first 30 d after infection, individuals with COVID-19 are at increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease spanning several categories, including cerebrovascular disorders, dysrhythmias, ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure and thromboembolic disease. These risks and burdens were evident even among individuals who were not hospitalized during the acute phase of the infection …”
- February 10, 2022: Heart-disease risk soars after COVID — even with a mild case: Massive study shows a long-term, substantial rise in risk of cardiovascular disease, including heart attack and stroke, after a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- February 11, 2022: COVID causes “substantial” longterm cardiovascular risks, huge study finds: COVID will affect cardiovascular health, health care for years to come, authors say.
- February 22, 2022: Are pandemic-related stressors impacting uninfected people's brain health?
Excerpt: “A new study reveals that living through the COVID-19 pandemic may trigger brain inflammation that contributes to fatigue, concentration difficulties, and depression.”
- COVID-19 and Depression
- February 25, 2022: Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line
Article discussing this: Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study
- March 1, 2022: SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals could have different variants hidden in different parts of the body: New research shows virus plays ultimate game of ‘hide and seek’ with immune system
Excerpt: “… this may make complete clearance of the virus from the body of an infected person, by their own antibodies, or by therapeutic antibody treatments, much more difficult.”
- Time magazine March 4, 2022: COVID-19 May Be Linked to Spontaneous Psychosis. Researchers Are Trying to Figure Out Why
- The Atlantic March 11, 2022: The Pandemic After the Pandemic: Long COVID isn't going away, and we still do not have a way to fully prevent it, cure it, or really to quantify it.
- March 15, 2022: Elevated inflammation persists in immune cells months after mild COVID-19
- March 16, 2022: Even Mild COVID Can Increase the Risk of Heart Problems: Scientists are just starting to unravel the disease's long-term cardiac effects
- March 21, 2022: COVID-19 Increases risk of type 2 diabetes, study finds
- March 31, 2022: Diabetes risk rises after COVID, massive study finds: Even mild SARS-CoV-2 infections can amplify a person's chance of developing diabetes, especially for those already susceptible to the disease.
- April 1, 2022: Are COVID-19-linked arrhythmias caused by viral damage to the heart's pacemaker cells?
Excerpt: “The SARS-CoV-2 virus can infect specialized pacemaker cells that maintain the heart's rhythmic beat, setting off a self-destruction process within the cells …”
- April 7, 2022: Covid-19 news: Severe blood clot risk rises 33-fold after infection
- April 19, 2022: About 30 percent of COVID patients develop 'Long COVID,' research finds
- April 20, 2022: U.S. rise in alcohol deaths reflects 'hidden tolls of the pandemic,' study finds
- April 21, 2022: COVID-19 can directly infect and damage human kidney cells
- April 22, 2022: What experts told me to do after my positive COVID-19 at-home test: It gets complicated to figure out how to report results and when you're no longer contagious
Excerpt: “… at-home testing will make underreporting even more prevalent. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's data show that only an estimated 7 percent of all U.S. COVID-19 cases are being reported …”
- April 24, 2022: Shanghai installs metal barriers and fences around people's homes to stop them from going out, in its latest brutal measure to battle Covid
- April 25, 2022: Covid-19 news: Hospitalised people don't fully recover after a year
- May 6, 2022: Obesity may weaken vaccine protection
- May 8, 2022: Surviving the pandemic is only half the battle: ‘Long COVID’ could affect a billion in just a few years
- May 16, 2022: Coronavirus may be linked to cases of severe hepatitis in children
- The New York Times May 16, 2022: How Often Can You Be Infected With the Coronavirus? The spread of the Omicron variant has given scientists an unsettling answer: repeatedly, sometimes within months.
- May 16, 2022: Deaths from alcohol use disorder surged during pandemic, study finds: Researchers found alcohol use disorder mortality rates were 25% higher than projected in 2020, 22% higher in 2021
- May 17, 2022: Pressure to conform to social norms may explain risky COVID-19 decisions: A trip to Disney World reveals how quickly “normal” can change
Comment: In Michigan, Florida, and elsewhere, there is now strong social pressure to not wear a mask — and if you do, people may stare as if what you're doing is odd because most folks think with their emotions, not logically. Regardless of what the coronavirus does, in their minds the pandemic is over. They have an emotional need to pressure others into believing that. So no matter how much Bill Gates thinks that masks are great (see my review of his book), masks not worn are utterly worthless. We need technology that strongly protects people from all airborne pathogens (not only SARS-CoV-2) whether or not they believe in science. The technology I developed is considerably more effective than masks, social distancing, vaccines, and therapeutics combined.
- May 18, 2022: The pandemic's true health cost: how much of our lives has COVID stolen? Researchers are trying to calculate how many years have been lost to disability and death.
- Time magazine May 18, 2022: As the Virus Evolves, COVID-19 Reinfections Are Going to Keep Happening
- May 19, 2022: Covid-19 news: World as vulnerable to pandemics as pre-coronavirus
Sharing air = sharing germs
Children understand why sharing drinking glasses and toothbrushes are risky, but experts ignore the risk of sharing air: when inside buildings with others, you inevitably inhale air and germs they exhaled. This simple fact explains our susceptibility to COVID-19, influenza, and many other diseases caused by airborne pathogens.
Obvious, huh? Then why do infectious disease and other experts act as if masks, social distancing, vaccines, and therapeutics are the only solutions possible? Because it seems impossible to stop airborne germs from diffusing. It is actually easy, if you know how.
As told in a History Channel documentary (The Toys That Built America: Masters of Invention S1 Ep1), after making a fortune on prior products, Wham-O co-founders Richard Knerr and Arthur Melin looked for their next big idea, wisely realizing it could come from anyone (a kindred spirit: Master Lock co-founder Harry Soref). Commenting on that, Laurie Schacht, Chief Toy Officer for The Toy Insider, insightfully noted:
“Melin and Knerr didn't think that they were the only ones who could invent something fabulous, and they had this amazing open-door policy: it didn't matter who you were; if you had an idea, they were going to listen.”
Unfortunately, receptiveness to new ideas is less common than being wedded to old ones. Albert Einstein once was a patent clerk working in obscurity and so frustrated with the difficulty of gaining traction for his ideas that he considered giving up and becoming an insurance salesman.
“A new scientific truth does not generally triumph by persuading its opponents and getting them to admit their errors, but rather by its opponents gradually dying out and giving way to a new generation that is raised on it.”
This reality, commonly paraphrased as “science advances one funeral at a time,” is ultimately based on intellectual rigidity. Paradoxically, it is less likely to affect ordinary folks than prominent thinkers impressed with their minds, perhaps because “Big egos have little ears,” as Robert Schuller famously pointed out. Progress in science, business, and politics is stymied as individuals who don't know 99.99999% of people in the world fool themselves into believing that the tiny fraction they do know includes everyone they need to know — that somehow the best ideas come from only them.
This preposterous self-aggrandizing prejudice can be deadly. In regard to this pandemic, there are major problems with masks and social distancing as well as current therapeutics and vaccines that collectively leave us desperate for something more effective. But the more things change, the more they don't:
“In the 1950s, people welcomed big plans and asked whether they would work. Today a grand plan coming from [someone not already a well-known expert] would be dismissed as crankery, and a long-range vision coming from anyone more powerful would be derided as hubris.”
— Peter Thiel
On November 20, 2021, The New York Times asked, “When can the Covid masks finally come off?” Answer: When the world utilizes my technology to safeguard air.
- January 19, 2022: Where are you most likely to catch COVID? New study highlights high risk locations
Based on: Practical Indicators for Risk of Airborne Transmission in Shared Indoor Environments and Their Application to COVID-19 Outbreaks
Excerpt: “We urgently need to improve the safety of the air that we breathe across a range of environments …”
Comment: My technology is the best way to do that.
- July 20, 2020: U.S. companies fear workplace coronavirus precautions do not address airborne risk
Comment: Exactly! When Bill Clinton's strategist James Carville famously said, “it's the economy, stupid,” it wasn't just the economy, but the economy was the primary issue. What I realized very early in the pandemic — and what has since been corroborated by science — is that the primary route of COVID-19 transmission is via the air. Ergo, it's the air, stupid.
You cannot design and build your own car brakes. That would be foolish because your life and the lives of others depend on them — but you can make your own mask and wear it however you choose.
The six-foot social distancing guideline originated from a Trump political appointee who clearly didn't understand science.
Lockdowns proved better at killing the economy than the virus, which predictably rebounded in a flash.
Vaccines sometimes work but often don't. If you are vaccinated, you can choose one that is substantially less effective and ignore various factors that affect your natural immunity as well as your response to vaccines.
Is it any wonder why the pandemic is so poorly controlled?
But as Henry Ford advised, “Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.” As a physician trained in science, I listen to other scientists, including ones who found that even mild COVID-19 can damage the brain and trigger many other devastating effects. So I did something about it, creating novel ways to safeguard us from the coronavirus and other airborne pathogens.
The solution: how to quickly end the pandemic
Video length: 2 min 47 sec
A better summary (10 min 0 sec):
The primary reason why the pandemic is so difficult to control is because we permit exhaled aerosols and the germs they carry to diffuse around rooms. I realized that when air spreads germs, air is the problem AND the solution, so I developed technology to rapidly move exhaled droplets and aerosols in a safe direction, thereby protecting people more than masks, social distancing, and even vaccines that I recommend yet don't reliably block infection.
These videos summarize one of the operational principles that is more fully explained in the 63-minute video below that demonstrates two prototypes in use.
|My tech||Masks||Social distancing||Vaccines|
|protects equally well while eating|
|no loss of efficacy over time|
|no increase exposure to PFAS, unlike masks|
|can strongly protect everyone, thus reducing stress|
|reliably blocks all current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants|
|superb protection from all airborne infectious diseases and air pollution|
|no risk of side effects|
|not potentially divisive|
|protects those unwilling or unable to cooperate|
|immune to fakery (e.g., counterfeit masks and vaccine cards)|
|enables people to safely congregate|
|can instantly simulate herd immunity|
|could realistically prevent pandemics|
|a valuable example of quickly solving a major problem|
I developed methods to safeguard air to reduce the risk of acquiring airborne infectious diseases by over 99%. I advocate vaccines and other common-sense precautions but the COVID-19 resurgence after a year of vaccinations (and acquisition of natural immunity via infection) proves that controlling the highly transmissible Delta variant requires additional mitigation methods.
The authors of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 Delta variant replication and immune evasion corroborated that by writing:
“The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant … is 6-fold less sensitive to serum neutralising antibodies from recovered individuals, and 8-fold less sensitive to vaccine-elicited antibodies as compared to wild type(WT) Wuhan-1 bearing D614G. … Compromised vaccine efficacy against the highly fit and immune evasive B.1.617.2 Delta variant warrants continued infection control measures in the post-vaccination era.”
Want a second opinion?
“We have no technology to stop the spread of COVID. Lockdowns do not stop the spread of COVID, they cause devastating harms; the vaccines — they can protect you against severe disease, but they will not stop the spread of COVID. No matter how many boosters you do, we do not have the technology that will stop the spread of COVID.”
— Stanford University Professor of Medicine Jayanta Bhattacharya, MD, PhD (on television August 30, 2021)
“We have no technology to stop it. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting it.”
— Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya (on television May 9, 2022)
Comment: His last point is true; his first statement is not because we do have technology to stop it: the technology I developed. This website presents one of my many relevant innovations.
SARS-CoV-2 generates variants faster than we can develop, manufacture, distribute, and administer vaccines. Some experts fear the emergence of a COVID-19 doomsday variant. Epidemiologist Dr. Michael Osterholm said the next variant “could be Delta on steroids.” If so, that could mean our economy on life support and a shocking surge in morbidity and mortality. The United Kingdom's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies said it was a “realistic possibility” that a variant could emerge that “evades current vaccines” and “likely” that a drug-resistant variant will evolve. They also warned that a future variant could kill up to one in three people. Dr. Anthony Fauci echoed that, cautioning that a possible “monster variant” more deadly than Delta may develop.
- September 14, 2021: A Leading Virologist Reveals His Two 'Nightmare' Viruses
- December 20, 2021: ‘Nobody was expecting omicron — this one really was a curveball’: Francis Collins, National Institutes of Health's outgoing director, issues warning to Americans
Comment: Wrong: several experts and I predicted the emergence of more worrisome variants. SARS-CoV-2 is prone to mutate. As bad as omicron is, it won't be the last knockout blow delivered to humanity. Unfortunately, its devastation is aided and abetted by those who fool themselves into believing that the pandemic is overblown or that current control measures are good enough in spite of evidence conclusively proving that they are not.
- The Atlantic May 13, 2022: The U.S. Is About to Make a Big Gamble on Our Next COVID Winter: Experts are expected to choose a vaccine recipe for the fall, when Omicron may or may not still be the globe's dominant variant.
- May 17, 2022: Future COVID variants will likely reinfect us multiple times a year, experts say — unless we invest in new vaccines
Comment: That may or may not provide much protection and almost certainly will fail to stop disease transmission. We will continue to be plagued by this and other pandemics until we invest in technology to block pathogen transmission, such as my innovations that combat diseases transmitted by contact and via air.
- March 1, 2022: Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domains may result in escape variants resistant to therapeutics and vaccines
- December 23, 2021: 'Drug cocktail' may be needed as COVID variants attack immune system on multiple fronts
Excerpt: [quoting William A. Haseltine, Ph.D., former professor at Harvard Medical School acclaimed for groundbreaking research on HIV/AIDS and the human genome] “People are asking, ‘Will it get weaker?’ They should be asking how much more dangerous it can get, and the answer is much more.”
- February 17, 2022: Discovery of New HIV Variant Sends Warning for COVID Pandemic: Infectious disease expert William A. Haseltine cautions that a coronavirus variant could emerge with the transmissibility of Omicron and the deadliness of the original SARS
- Scientific American March 2022 Issue: Contagions Worse Than COVID Will Prevail If Neglect of Global Public Health Continues: Health security is as important to a nation as a standing army
- The Atlantic March 9, 2022: The Coronavirus's Next Move
- April 16, 2022: China's New COVID Crisis Could Spawn the Worst Variant Yet: The current surge sweeping the country threatens to spiral into a dangerous new mutation.
- April 25, 2022: Many Americans feel the pandemic is over, but new, highly transmissible and immune-evasive variants are likely, says White House COVID response coordinator
- April 29, 2022: U.S. records first case of highly contagious bird flu in human, health officials say
- May 3, 2022: Bill Gates warns there's ‘way above a 5% risk’ we haven't yet seen the worst of COVID — and calls for the creation of $1 billion-a-year team to stop another pandemic
Comment: Gates proposes that in his book How to Prevent the Next Pandemic, but as my review of it (the first one posted on Amazon) indicates, that will almost certainly fail to achieve that objective.
- May 6, 2022: Nightmare COVID Variants Are Cracking the Code to Our Immunity: The speed of mutations has reached a new height, and the subvariants breaking out around the world now are the most transmissible yet.
- May 9, 2022: The cause of the next pandemic is probably already here
- May 16, 2022: Wisconsin fox kits test positive for highly pathogenic avian influenza
- Harvard epidemiologist William Hanage December 21, 2021: The best-case scenario with omicron will still be bad: Don't be too reassured yet by the thought that the variant mostly causes mild cases
Excerpt #1: “Hope is not an effective strategy for dealing with a pandemic. … there has been a steady tide of coverage and commentary suggesting that omicron causes mostly mild disease – the implication being that it's not much to worry about, that if we only stay the course we can ride this one out, too. But that's premature. Let me be clear: I'm not stating definitively that omicron has some grim future in store for us. I'm saying that there are red flashing warning signs, that we underestimate this virus at our peril and that even the best-case scenario is still bad. … a ‘mild’ case of covid-19 can still make you miserable … There's also the risk of long covid, which can cause physical and cognitive issues for many weeks and months after recovery from the acute phase of illness … Omicron's very existence reminds us that this virus will keep mutating and will continue to pose grave threats for years to come. … it is past time to develop proactive strategies for living in a world where the coronavirus is continually circulating and we work to minimize its toll.”
Comment #1: That is exactly what I've done by developing a spectrum of technologies to combat airborne and contact infectious disease transmission, a small percentage of which is presented in this website.
Excerpt #2: “… the virus … is just moving more quickly than anyone could have imagined – and more quickly than any of us can pivot to respond to it.”
Comment #2: It is indisputably true that the coronavirus from Hell generates variants faster than we can develop, manufacture, distribute, and administer vaccines, but my technology puts us in a very advantageous position: instead of constantly trying to play catch-up, it is ready to neutralize the threat of future variants before they evolve.
- January 22, 2022: Our war with natural selection: Omicron may not necessarily be the last punishing wave
Excerpt: “Understandably, many people have embraced the comforting belief that SARS-CoV-2 must evolve to cause milder disease. It's just not true, virologists say. Smallpox did not grow milder over time, nor did polio, HIV/AIDS, or Ebola.”
- December 23, 2021: Is Omicron a New Wave or a Parallel Pandemic?
Comment: This raises a harrowing possibility: that this pandemic may splinter into multiple ones with vaccines and immune protection from one type doing little to protect from others. This could continue to evolve until we have too many variants to feasibly handle. My technology obviates that concern because it protects equally well from all airborne infectious diseases no matter how they mutate.
Related: December 29, 2021: 2022 preview: What will the coronavirus do next?
Excerpt #1: “… there may be no limit to [the coronavirus's] ability to evade our immune response. As happens with human flu viruses, we may see the continual emergence of new variants that evade immunity enough to cause wave after wave of infections. It is possible that, over time, different viral lineages will persist and diverge, rather than successive variants wiping out all others and sweeping to dominance.”
Comment #1: Corroborating what I wrote above.
Excerpt #2: “It is often claimed that new viruses will evolve to cause milder symptoms. But because SARS-CoV-2 is most infectious just before symptoms appear, there is little selective pressure for it to do this.”
Comment #2: Ponder this reality while connecting the dots with the quotations from various experts warning that this horrible pandemic could evolve into one much worse, potentially killing billions of people who may learn a very painful lesson: that vaccines are not the best way to control rapidly mutating pathogens like SARS-CoV-2.
Currently, we are gambling that the current control measures that haven't worked very well — masks, social distancing, and vaccines — will somehow give us our old lives back or at least some semi-tolerable facsimile of them, if we only double down on those control measures that are proving better at striking out than hitting home runs. More realistically, we should acknowledge the imperative to find and implement Plan B.
I realized this need before the pandemic visibly struck the United States. On March 30, 2020, a friend revealed she thought I was “The Prophet of Doom” after weeks of hearing me forecast how nightmarish this pandemic would become. She subsequently admitted that all of my prognostications were accurate along with my other assessments, such as that the primary mode of SARS-CoV-2 transmission was airborne, that infections frequently spread before symptoms appear, that handwashing could not control it, and that it would be very difficult to develop vaccines that block transmission sufficient to achieve herd immunity — something that now seems like a pipe dream to experts. With my spot-on track record of forecasting this pandemic, I realize that relying on what hasn't worked well is a monumental mistake.
Excerpt #3: “Another concern is that the virus might be circulating in several other animals, generating new variants that could jump back into people.”
Comment #3: Another point I made last year in my other COVID website. We cannot eliminate that threat by vaccinating animals.
Related: Was the Russian flu a ‘coronavirus’? What the 1890s pandemic tells us about how Covid might end: There are some striking similarities between this virus and its 19th century ancestor – perhaps lessons from the past can show us our future
Excerpt: “‘You don't get herd immunity with coronaviruses,’ says Paul Hunter, an epidemiologist at the University of East Anglia.”
- February 3, 2022: Highly virulent HIV variant found circulating in Europe
Excerpt: “The findings … also serve as a reminder that viruses do not always evolve to become less virulent over time.”
- January 28, 2021: SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and the Growing Threat of Viral Variants
- February 18, 2021: Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity
- February 10, 2022: Researchers identify SARS-CoV-2 variants with potential to escape cellular immune response
- December 27, 2021: Massive New Bird Flu Outbreak Could Be 2022's Deadly Pandemic
Excerpt: “… scientists warn [that it] could become a ‘mass disaster’ for humans. … The virus can be deadly if it infects people. The World Health Organization says more than half of the confirmed 863 human cases it has tracked since 2003 proved fatal.”
- January 4, 2022: New COVID variant ‘IHU’ with 46 mutations detected in France
- January 5, 2022: The Next Big COVID Variant Could Be a Triple Whammy Nightmare: Future variants could combine the most dangerous traits of older COVID lineages—to devastating effect.
- January 6, 2022: Preparing for the Next Plague: SARS-CoV-2 adds impetus to the race for broad-spectrum countermeasures against future global infectious scourges
Excerpt: “… the success of the present vaccines [limited as they are, unable to reliably block infection] was also somewhat serendipitous, as coronaviruses have a particularly easy target in their spike (S) protein, not to mention having been the subject of more than a decade of research after the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in 2002 and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in 2015. In the next pandemic, the world may not be so lucky.”
Comment: Experts forecast that a future pandemic could kill billions of people. No current or foreseeable biotechnology can ensure our safety, but my innovations can (for diseases transmitted via the air) by blocking airborne germ transmission.
- January 15, 2022: Expect more worrisome variants after omicron, scientists say
Comment: Future variants are virtually inevitable. Parenthetically, the picture accompanying this article shows what I've seen in countless other lines of people crammed like sardines waiting for COVID-19 tests with few or none of them wearing N95 or better masks. If they didn't have COVID-19 before, they likely will after such exposure. This illustrates yet another aspect of how our national response to this pandemic has been exasperatingly idiotic. Anyone with an ounce of common sense could think of a much better way to handle such testing.
- January 24, 2022: COVID's Turbo-Mutation Is Killing This Vax Dream, So What's Next? The aspiration to tackle new variants with specific vaccines is falling apart because the dominant strain changes so quickly. The good news is that there might be a better plan.
Excerpt: “A ‘pan-coronavirus’ vaccine is the holy grail of public health.”
Comment: That isn't yet available, and may never be. In contrast, my technology is even more effective, and it is available now.
- January 26, 2022: How much more contagious could the coronavirus get? The coronavirus is evolving to become more transmissible, and eventually it could even overtake measles, the most contagious virus we know of
- January 26, 2022: Two thirds of people who catch omicron have already had Covid, study finds: Variant's ability to dodge immune system means reinfections have gone from a miniscule proportion of all infections to a sizeable chunk
- February 25, 2022: Bird flu sweeping through poultry in eastern US
Excerpt: “The virus—called Eurasian H5N1 … doesn't spread efficiently among humans, but when it does it has a death rate of 60% … it can decimate a country's poultry industry. … Farmers say they have been stunned by how efficiently the virus kills, with animals dying hours after the initial infection …”
“This virus is replicating at a high capacity in humans, and as a consequence the risk for variant evolution is extremely high. We dealt with the UK variant — everyone thought that was pretty bad; it was twice as infectious but lo and behold three, four months later we have the Delta variant, and now it is the dominant variant in the United States. Sadly, I'm going to predict that within two, three, four months we're going to have another variant, and that variant is going to be more infectious than the Delta variant.”
— Robert R. Redfield, MD, then Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, August 9, 2020 (on television)
“Anything said in advance of a pandemic seems alarmist. After a pandemic begins, anything one has said or done is inadequate.”
— Michael O. Leavitt, United States Secretary of Health and Human Services 2005 – 2009 (source)
Plan B for the pandemic
What will it take to control this pandemic? Masks that don't work very well and people are increasingly fed up with? Social distancing that flopped (example)? If vaccines could give us our old lives back, the FDA vaccine advisory panel would not have voted 16–2 to reject the widespread use of booster shots. Furthermore, masks block facial expression, an important aspect of communication.
- December 21, 2021: POLITICO Playbook: The search for a Plan B begins
- December 27, 2021: Alain Pinel: Vaccine opponents won't change their minds, so let's find a Plan B
Excerpt: “After long and grueling months of a failed strategy, it's about time to work on a Plan B … [by] trying to reduce the risks of getting COVID …”
Comment: What I began doing before the pandemic struck the United States.
We unquestionably need something much more effective and reliable, offering protection so dependable it obviates the need for masks and social distancing that doesn't work because the virus is airborne and can float much further than people can feasibly separate. My technology can provide this protection better than masks, social distancing, and even vaccines that were designed to target the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, not the Delta variant that “has quickly become the dominant strain in the U.S., and … appears to spread even among fully vaccinated people” (source).
- October 3, 2021: Virus surge hits New England despite high vaccination rates
- August 22, 2021: Will Vaccines Be Updated for Delta?
- Infection Control Today August 17, 2021: COVID-19 Booster Shots Alone Might Not Stop Delta and Other Variants
- August 13, 2021: Expert shares equation that shows even a 100% vaccination rate is not enough to stop Delta variant
Excerpt: “A professor of epidemiology at Boston University recently tweeted equations that explain why Delta has made it mathematically impossible to beat the virus now with just the vaccine …”
Based on: Dr. Ellie Murray, ScD (@EpiEllie): THINK LIKE AN EPIDEMIOLOGIST
- The Washington Post August 12, 2021: Booster shots won’t stop the delta variant. Here's the math to prove it.
- August 10, 2021: Delta variant renders herd immunity from Covid ‘mythical’
- September 8, 2020: It Will Take More Than a Vaccine to Beat COVID-19
- July 24, 2020: What's the backup plan if there's no COVID-19 vaccine? Analysis: Recent news from vaccine trials has been promising, but some experts worry that the U.S. needs a Plan B.
Excerpt: “‘I think we absolutely have to have a backup plan in place,’ Carl Bergstrom, a biologist at the University of Washington, said. ‘It's something that's not talked about enough.’”
Comment: Wise words: the vaccines initially seemed promising but they don't reliably block infection (1, 2).
Not surprisingly, COVID-19 has killed over 900,000 Americans — more than the entire population of South Dakota and more than the number who died in combat during World War I (53,402), World War II (291,557), and the Civil War (214,938). And over 300 times more Americans than died on 9/11. And more than the number of Americans who died during the 1918 influenza pandemic. And more “in less than two years than the approximately 700,000 who have died in the U.S. in the four decades of the AIDS pandemic.” As alarming as the official U.S. COVID death toll is, “the true number is likely much higher” (1, 2) — “countries have reported some five million COVID-19 deaths in two years, but global excess deaths are estimated at double or even quadruple that figure.”
- Scientific American February 10, 2022: There Is Nothing Normal about One Million People Dead from COVID: Mass media and policy makers are pushing for a return to pre-COVID times while trying to normalize a staggering death toll
- March 10, 2022: COVID's true death toll: far higher than official records: Modelling suggests that by the end of 2021, some 18 million people had died because of the pandemic.
- May 5, 2022: COVID led to 15 million deaths globally, not the 5 million reported - WHO
- March 23, 2022: Morgue data hint at COVID's true toll in Africa: Around 90% of deceased people tested at a Lusaka facility during coronavirus surges were positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggesting flaws in the idea of an ‘African paradox’.
- March 26, 2022: What a Single Metric Tells Us About the Pandemic
Comment: Excess mortality rate.
- March 29, 2022: What One Million COVID Dead Mean for the U.S.'s Future: The country is about to reach an unthinkably grim milestone. Nearly 200,000 children have lost parents, many more elderly have been killed, and family well-being has been ripped apart
- May 10, 2022: The ‘five pandemics’ driving 1 million U.S. Covid deaths
The specter of original antigenic sin
Original antigenic sin (OAS), also called antigenic imprinting or the Hoskins effect, may render COVID-19 boosters less effective. OAS occurs when the immune system becomes essentially locked in after the initial exposure to a pathogen (or vaccine for it), preventing it from optimally responding to subsequent exposures (infection or vaccination) to similar but not identical antigens, such as from one of the current SARS-CoV-2 variants (e.g., Delta) as opposed to the original strain for which current vaccines were developed and many people were infected.
OAS occurs in influenza (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) and dengue fever (1, 2, 3) but researchers don't yet know if it will reduce immunological effectiveness as the coronavirus evolves new variants. Because of OAS and other reasons, it isn't wise to presume that boosters will be sufficiently effective or will remain that way. With our lives and the economy on the line, assuming that boosters will save us may prove to be a reckless gamble.
- April 16, 2021: Next-generation Covid-19 vaccines are supposed to be better. Some experts worry they could be worse
- June 9, 2021: Evidence for Deleterious Antigenic Imprinting in SARS-CoV-2 Immune Response
- March 10, 2021: Original Antigenic Sin: the Downside of Immunological Memory and Implications for COVID-19
- May 13, 2022: The CDC says to think again before getting a second COVID booster. Is it rationing vaccines?
Excerpt: “The government wants you to wait on getting that fourth vaccine shot, and it won’t say exactly why.”
Comment: He who has nothing to hide, hides nothing.
- October 23, 2020: Should you get the first coronavirus vaccine available? A 60-year-old scientific doctrine may have the answer
Excerpt: “Dr. Jay Levy, a professor of medicine at UCSF, said the doctrine [of Original Antigenic Sin] suggests that a person inoculated with a vaccine for COVID-19 might develop an immunological memory to that specific vaccine, which would prevent him or her from benefiting from stronger vaccines produced later.”
Comment: This raises an interesting philosophical and practical question: is it ethical and wise to now compel COVID-19 vaccinations? Current vaccines target the original SARS-CoV-2 strain but the United States is currently plagued by the Delta variant and very likely others to follow. Vaccinating for the original strain, in effect teaching our immune systems to fight yesterday's battle, may make us less able to fight future battles as this coronavirus mutates, generating different antigenic epitopes. The technology introduced in this website provides a solution to this quandary because it is immune (no pun intended) to antigenic imprinting/OAS.
- May 5, 2021: Why Vaccine Boosters May Not Solve the Mutating Coronavirus Problem
- July 9, 2021: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the context of original antigenic sin
Excerpt: “Hence, the extremely high levels of specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies achieved by vaccination, which — as indicated by the most recent data — tend to persist for months post-vaccination, should serve as a warning sign.”
- May 3, 2021: “Original antigenic sin”: A potential threat beyond the development of booster vaccination against novel SARS-CoV-2 variants
- August 10, 2020: A Novel Hypothesis for Original Antigenic Sin in the Severe Disease of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
- June 5, 2020: Antibody Dependent Enhancement Due to Original Antigenic Sin and the Development of SARS
Excerpt: “The worst scenario would be when such cross-reactive memory antibodies to related coronaviruses would not only be non-protective but even enhance infection and the clinical course. Such a phenomenon of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) has already been described in several viral infections. Thus, the development of IgG [immunoglobulin G] against SARS-CoV-2 in the course of COVID-19 might not be a simple sign of viral clearance and developing protection against the virus. On the contrary, due to cross-reaction to related coronavirus strains from earlier infections, in certain patients IgG might enhance clinical progression due to ADE.”
Related: Is COVID-19 receiving ADE from other coronaviruses?
- May 7, 2020: What about the original antigenic sin of the humans versus SARS-CoV-2?
- January 15, 2019: Original Antigenic Sin: How First Exposure Shapes Lifelong Anti-Influenza Virus Immune Responses
- July 30, 1998: Original antigenic sin impairs cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to viruses bearing variant epitopes
- Original antigenic sin: A comprehensive review
- August 31, 2021: The resurgence risk of COVID-19 in the presence of immunity waning and ADE effect: a mathematical modelling study
Excerpt: “The findings reveal that integrated effects of multiple factors, including immunity waning, ADE [antibody-dependent enhancement], relaxed interventions, and higher transmission ability of variants, make the control of COVID-19 much more difficult. We should get ready for a long struggle with COVID-19, and should not totally rely on COVID-19 vaccine. … the existence of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in the infection of SARS-CoV-2 has been reported recently. … ADE phenomenon is well documented between different dengue serotypes and Zika virus, and the infection of other corona viruses, including MERS and SARS. In a recent publication, Liu et al. showed that COVID-19 patients can not only produce antibodies against the RBD of the spike protein to block the SARS-CoV-2 infections, but also produce the anti-spike antibodies enhancing ACE2 binding, consequently enhancing the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. This supports the existence of the ADE in SARS-CoV-2 infections.”
- An infectivity-enhancing site on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein targeted by antibodies
Excerpt: “These findings demonstrate that not only neutralizing antibodies but also enhancing antibodies are produced during SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
- Two Different Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) Risks for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
- The discontinuity theory of immunity
Excerpt: “According to the discontinuity theory of immunity, the immune system responds to sudden changes in antigenic stimulation and is rendered tolerant by slow or continuous stimulation.”
- An infectivity-enhancing site on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein targeted by antibodies
- November 18, 2021: Face masks and distancing are most effective measures in reducing COVID-19 spread, study finds, as experts clamor for U.S. to expand booster program
Comment: Neither face masks nor social distancing work very well. Stating they are the “most effective measures in reducing COVID-19 spread” is saying vaccines don't work very well, and since they don't effectively block SARS-CoV-2 transmission, boosters will temporarily restore immunity but their protective value will also diminish in time.
- February 7, 2022: Moderna's omicron booster was only as good as current vaccine in monkey study: Boosting with an omicron-specific vaccine didn't offer more protection against omicron.
Comment: In other words, it didn't work very well.
Excerpt: “… the finding falls in line with the concept of "original antigenic sin" (aka antigenic imprinting). … And, while the current booster also spurred responses that were specific only to the old virus, the omicron booster didn't seem to spur any omicron-specific B cell responses.”
Comment: When I wrote about original antigenic sin last year, I suggested that this problem might also plague our response to SARS-CoV-2, and indeed this appears to be happening.
We put our eggs in the vaccine basket but are already witnessing troubling signs of that becoming a painful lesson from the School of Hard Knocks, such as a journalist attending a family reunion where everyone was fully vaccinated yet every adult contracted COVID-19. The vaccines were once hyped as being anywhere from 95 – 99.96% effective. If that were anywhere near true, it would be virtually impossible for them to fail as often as they do unless their efficacy against the Delta variant is markedly lower than their effectiveness against the original SARS-CoV-2 strain. Antigenic imprinting/OAS may help explain why, and to the extent that is true, it doesn't bode well for the future.
When masks, social distancing, lockdowns, and vaccines leave us desperate for better protection, the trillion-dollar question is: what else can we do? My epiphany was realizing that when air spreads germs, air is the problem and the solution.
Every physical object that travels in air is affected by its movement. This applies to single atoms and molecules as well as leaves, dust, snow, rain, baseballs, bullets, and even massive artillery projectiles. Another example is how microbursts (a.k.a. downbursts or downdrafts) can slam large aircraft to the ground, such as the microburst that downed Delta Air Lines Flight 191, killing 137 people, including Don Estridge, known as the father of the IBM PC.
Experts agree that microbursts are the most likely explanation for the startling number of air crashes (roughly 2000) in the Nevada Triangle, whose vertices span from Fresno, California to Reno and Las Vegas, Nevada. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) attributed the death of famed aviator Steve Fossett, the Nevada Triangle's most prominent victim, to a downdraft.
While heavy airborne objects are susceptible to air motion, air currents especially affect lightweight objects such as respiratory droplets and aerosols emitted when people speak, sneeze, cough, or just breathe. Consequently, even slight wind or other air currents can substantially affect translocation of respiratory plumes that may contain viruses or other infectious agents.
Experts commonly advise increasing ventilation but even if you open every window or constantly run your HVAC blower, the fact that the resulting indoor air currents are substantially horizontal increases the risk of helping the coronavirus and other pathogens spread from infected individuals to those downwind.
Substantiating this, Penn State researchers reported that “… aerosols traveled farther and more quickly in rooms with displacement ventilation, where fresh air continuously flows from the floor and pushes old air to an exhaust vent near the ceiling. This is the type of ventilation system installed in most residential homes, and it can result in a human breathing zone concentration of viral aerosols seven times higher than mixed-mode ventilation systems. Many commercial buildings use mixed-mode systems, which incorporate outside air to dilute the indoor air …”
Yet indoor transmission remains a significant problem even in commercial buildings. This has devastated Las Vegas (1, 2), meat and poultry processing plants (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and multiple other industries that collectively have wreaked havoc on global supply chains (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and instilled an understandable fear of returning to the office (1, 2, 3), affecting half of American professionals and triggering unrelenting dread that “Delta is tempting us to trade lives for freedoms, a choice it seemed we wouldn't have to make.”
- May 5, 2022: How mechanical ventilation affects the trajectories of aerosols that may carry viral particles
Excerpt: “The models show that mixing-flow ventilation is the most effective form of ventilation for reducing the risk of the virus spreading between people sharing an indoor space. This form of ventilation finds the aerosol particles pulled along by the ventilation airstream and expelled to the outside through the system's ducting with much less chance of them being inhaled by another person in the room. This is not the case with the other types of ventilation where the air is essentially recirculated within the indoor space to large degree and so virus-laden aerosols might be inhaled by other people.” (emphasis added)
Based on: Modelling of aerosol trajectories in a mechanically-ventilated study room using computational fluid dynamics in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
Thus, traditional HVAC systems cannot reliably safeguard us because vulnerable people are often downwind from infected individuals. To put it bluntly, it isn't wise to move air without considering if its direction follows the ideal path. This isn't speculation; the medical literature documented examples of existing HVAC systems helping transmit COVID-19 to people considerably further apart than 6 feet.
Early in the pandemic, I realized that we needed a better approach in which air is directed in a direction known to be safe. The optimal direction is usually vertical, typically best directed from ceiling to floor but occasionally the opposite and sometimes horizontally when that is identified as the known safe direction, not moving it laterally without thinking, as traditional HVAC systems do.
A vector is a quantity specified by a magnitude and a direction. Physicists and engineers often speak of force vectors, such as applying 20 pounds of force to lift a log straight up. Another example is driving your car at 65 mph heading north.
When air moves, whether because of wind or HVAC blowers, it also has a speed and direction. However, in commercial and residential buildings, that speed and direction are almost never ideal — or anywhere close to it — in terms of reducing the risk of germ transmission. Instead, air generally moves laterally when forced-air HVAC systems are on and otherwise randomly diffuses around the room.
If you've seen sunlight streaming in highlighting airborne dust, you noticed that it isn't stationary even when the room has no discernible air currents but instead moves constantly, carrying other airborne objects, such as respiratory aerosols emitted from room occupants. If one or more of them are infected with COVID-19, their droplets and aerosols float through the air and too often land in the eyes, nose, or mouth of others, infecting them.
This is the primary route of COVID-19 transmission. To block it, we need to realize that:
- Whether at home or in public settings, people are usually separated horizontally; that is, no one hovers over you — one of the few exceptions is during dental treatment.
- Therefore, moving air laterally risks transferring germs from infected people to those downwind. This can be almost entirely prevented by moving air vertically, such as from the ceiling to floor.
One of the proprietary parts of my system makes that practical. Without it, air would deflect off the floor and move laterally. That is what we want to AVOID, and my system can achieve that, as I can demonstrate to manufacturers and contractors interested in commercializing this technology.
I used that principle to develop other devices achieving around-the-clock, anywhere you go protection that, if widely implemented, would enable us to resume normal lives even better than the ones we had pre-pandemic.
Adding another layer of protection
Appearing on television September 9, 2021, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy spoke of layers of protection against COVID-19. In the United States, masks, social distancing, lockdowns, vaccines, and therapeutics have been emphasized while others have been largely neglected. These include nutrition, exercise (by enhancing immunity and increasing the response to vaccines), and smoke exposure as well as other factors, including those encompassed within the exposome that crucially influences health yet is unfortunately given short shrift. Collectively these factors help account for the highly variable presentation of COVID-19, ranging from infected individuals experiencing no symptoms to others who die as a result. Case studies of identical twins suggest that those factors contribute to the markedly different outcomes, indicating that they hinge on more than genes.
For example, researchers found that people in the highest quartile of diet scores have a “41% lower risk of developing severe COVID-19.” That protective value would be even greater in those consuming truly healthy diets because “ultra-processed foods account for 58% of total energy in the average U.S. diet” and comprise two-thirds of calories ingested by children and teens. Thus, someone can be in the top quartile of diet quality and still consume plenty of junk. Avoiding that would enable them to be even healthier.
People pay a steep price for their addiction to tasty and convenient food. There appears to be no way to wean them off it, but I developed a way to provide convenient food that is equally or more tasty and vastly healthier yet substantially less expensive. Highly processed foods are sabotaging our physical and mental health. Investors: according to Forbes, food is the world's biggest industry, and I have a way to fundamentally disrupt it.
My technology adds another layer of protection. Because it can block over 99% of airborne pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, it can be even more effective than the other layers that together are now not adequately controlling the pandemic. We should take a more comprehensive approach to consider every factor influencing COVID-19 acquisition and severity, including nutrition, exercise, smoke and other exposome determinants.
Because COVID-19 is primarily transmitted via the air, substantially blocking that path — as my technology does — could achieve markedly better results and ones that are not limited to this coronavirus but include other airborne pathogens and air pollution.
As discussed in the video below, people usually assume that if they survive an infection, they fully recover without lingering adverse effects (sequelae in medspeak). Researchers are accumulating increasing evidence this isn't true, instead discovering that infections slowly chip away at health and accelerate aging. Laymen often blame passing time for problems associated with aging, but time is certainly not the only factor. Broader recognition of this would better highlight the importance of prevention.
- December 1, 2021: Psychiatrists are uncovering connections between viruses and mental health. They're surprising.: Immune responses to viruses like SARS-CoV-2 may affect mental health, and vice versa. Doctors are uncovering exactly how.
- January 7, 2022: Outbreak reported at Rhode Island hospital after Covid-positive, asymptomatic staff asked to work
Illustrating how some damage is difficult or impossible to fully reverse, COVID-19 infection can result in long-lasting problems. One of them, discussed in the video below, is intellectual deterioration. Learning about the many others would inculcate the reality that COVID-19 should not be trivialized as being like influenza or “colds.”
This page summarizes some of the points made in the video below that also discusses how pharmaceuticals and surgery — the foundations of mainstream medicine — cannot fully reverse all damage resulting from neglected prevention. Prevention is commonly given lip service but rarely the attention it deserves because over 99% of possible preventive measures, including some major ones, are overlooked.
This is relevant to the disastrous problem we are now experiencing with the coronavirus pandemic. No prior recommendation has addressed the fundamental reason why this calamity is poorly controlled: because germs emitted by people are permitted to randomly disperse through the air, commonly infecting others.
Importantly, my innovations have nothing to do with ultraviolet, ionization, or bipolar ionization. I haven't seen any evidence that they are safe and effective for occupied rooms; ultraviolet undoubtedly kills germs, but it cannot neutralize the coronavirus at safe and practical power levels, and it is susceptible to shadowing. Beyond their possible safety risks is the fact that they cannot inactivate SARS-CoV-2 quickly enough. In contrast, my devices rapidly mitigate that risk with complete safety.
It isn't fair to blame individuals, organizations, schools, companies, and politicians for not implementing technology they don't know about, but now that I publicly disclosed what I developed and provided strong evidence in the video for its effectiveness, there is no valid excuse for not utilizing this additional layer of protection. My spectrum of innovation includes ways to safeguard people at little or no cost to introduce and operate the devices, thus enabling protection even for those in economically disadvantaged nations.
A famous person too polarizing to be named in this nonpartisan discussion recently said something no knowledgeable person would quibble with, observing:
“How to keep COVID from happening again is the biggest story of our lives.”
Masks, social distancing, vaccines, and therapeutics are no match for the Delta variant that may very well be eclipsed by others even more nightmarish. The coronavirus from hell is still in the driver seat. My technology can quickly stop it, liberating us from the omnipresent threat of airborne infectious diseases.
- The Atlantic November 1, 2021: America Has Lost the Plot on COVID: We're avoiding the hardest questions about living with the coronavirus long term.
Excerpt: “The answers were simpler when we thought we could vaccinate our way to herd immunity. … The Delta variant and waning immunity against transmission mean herd immunity may well be impossible even if every single American gets a shot. So when COVID-related restrictions came back with the Delta wave, we no longer had an obvious off-ramp to return to normal …”
Comment: My technology provides a practical path to quickly achieve that.
- November 2, 2021: COVID-19 has killed 5 million people—and the pandemic is far from over
The main (63-minute) video
- How Einstein and Edison would solve this pandemic: by thinking logically and creatively, bounded by science but not shackled by its frequent pessimism and lack of vision. Relevant quote:
“We are drowning in a sea of data and starving for knowledge.”
— Nobel Prize laureate Sydney Brenner, quoted in Biology must generate ideas as well as data. Excerpt: “Researchers seem reluctant to come to biological conclusions or present new ideas.”
- Multiple static and video demonstrations of the efficacy of my technology. Every logical person who watches the video will realize “This is it — this is how we can quickly control the pandemic.”
- SARS-CoV-2 has no ability to move on its own; its transmission depends on it being transported through the air. Because air is invisible, most people don't adequately understand how it moves and how that contributes to COVID-19 transmission. By making air motion visible, as I do in the video, this problem becomes obvious, even incontrovertible, as does the efficacy of my system that can markedly safeguard people from the coronavirus and other airborne infectious diseases. “Airborne diseases caused by viruses, bacteria and fungi can spread over distances ranging from a few feet up to hundreds of miles” and “lung infections are the fourth-leading cause of death worldwide,” so my innovations could substantially reduce the global disease burden.
- COVID-19 cases termed “mild” can produce agonizing symptoms and persistent, sometimes life-altering problems. One example: “This ‘mild’ covid is the sickest I've ever been.”
- Examples illustrating breakthrough infections in a startling number of fully vaccinated individuals, and their alarming consequences.
- Eyes are a potential route of SARS-CoV-2 exposure; my technology protects your eyes, nose, and mouth.
- Published research documents that 6 feet is not adequate social distancing.
- In recent decades, investors have generously funded the digital world but largely ignored many pressing problems in the real world — and we pay a steep price for their misfocus. This pandemic is unfortunately just one of many examples.
- The “it won't happen to me” conviction is so firmly embedded in most people that they won't perceive the need for safe air even if they watch this video repeatedly and explore the many references cited. Therefore, they need more than health functionality to tempt them, so my patent-pending system includes ways to make it more diversely useful and fun.
- Another pandemic is inevitable, and will likely happen sooner than you think. With the world being increasingly interconnected, it is imperative that we take steps to safeguard air, which can be achieved by my devices that protect you wherever you go.
- Some of this protection should be integrated into vehicles and buildings. We keep hearing about infrastructure; this is the infrastructure we need most.
- The coronavirus has several features making it easy to spread, but my technology neutralizes all of them.
- Even with masks, social distancing, lockdowns, and vaccines, considerably too many people are now being infected with COVID-19. We need better protection; my system delivers it.
- Experts are sometimes the last ones to spot the usefulness of breakthroughs.
- Having a solution often truncates the search for better ones.
- Infections have been implicated in triggering mental illness, Alzheimer's disease, and obesity.
- My technology has numerous secondary benefits. Two that I didn't mention in the video include minimizing exposure to airborne allergens and household dust that may seem innocuous but isn't because researchers documented that dust is often contaminated with chemicals that adversely affect our bodies and minds (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11).
- Human physiology is too complex for it to be optimized by pharmaceuticals that rarely deliver vibrant physical and mental health. For proof, look at the number of overweight and unhappy doctors: there is an epidemic of burnout, depression, and suicide afflicting the medical profession.
- Our collective affinity for quick fixes made us want to believe that vaccines would save the day, but they won't. Analogy: if you had bodyguards equally unable to fully protect you, you'd be looking for additional help. My innovations provide the missing links to better control this pandemic.
October 12, 2021: When breezy, wear masks outdoors to prevent coronavirus exposure
Excerpt: “… researchers … found when a person coughs outdoors, wind flowing in the same direction can propagate the virus faster over longer distances than in calm conditions. ‘The study is significant in that it points to the increased infection risk that coughing in the same direction as the wind could bring about,’ co-author Amit Agrawal said. ‘Based on the results, we recommend wearing masks outdoors, particularly in breezy conditions.’”
Comment: My video made that obvious.
Based on: Effect of co-flow on fluid dynamics of a cough jet with implications in spread of COVID-19
January 4, 2022: Coughing downward reduces spread of respiratory droplets: study
Comment: Pretty obvious, huh? Coughing emits both air and droplets that of course can be propelled more quickly downward by coughing downward, but the effectiveness of that is limited because coughing (as well as sneezing, talking, and breathing) also emits aerosols that can be propelled downward but don't stay there, instead diffusing around rooms unless my technology is used to block that.
Video length: 63 min 28 sec
YouTube did a superb job converting my massive video file into a format suitable for viewing on the Web. The video quality is stellar; the fluctuating audio quality resulted from my second-rate microphone, but my voice is always intelligible. Occasional sounds of my stomach growling (borborygmi) resulted from me skipping meals to complete this project. :-)
My goal was to make the world safe to live in again. The video visually demonstrates how I can achieve that goal, providing substantially better protection than masks, social distancing, and vaccines.
- Joseph Allen, associate professor at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, in The Atlantic October 3, 2021: Employers Have Been Offering the Wrong Office Amenities: Workplaces need fresh air, not foosball tables and coffee bars.
Excerpt: “… about 3 percent of the air you breathed in recently came out of the lungs of the people in the room with you right now.”
- Joseph Allen, et al. September 9, 2021: Associations between acute exposures to PM2.5 and carbon dioxide indoors and cognitive function in office workers: a multicountry longitudinal prospective observational study
Comment: Better air, better thinking.
The innovator explains why masks, social distancing, and vaccines won't be enough
Colin Powell, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and United States Secretary of State, is one of the many fully vaccinated people who died of COVID-19 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Since the pandemic began, five times as many police officers died from COVID-19 as from guns despite masks, vaccines, and everything else. We obviously need a better way to more reliably protect people from airborne infectious diseases.
Very early in the pandemic, as various experts emphasized handwashing and trivialized the utility of masks or even strongly discouraged their use, the local hospital exasperated me by instructing employees to NOT wear masks because they “might alarm the patients.”
I knew that masks have drawbacks but COVID-19 was obviously a greater risk, so I did my best to persuade them to utilize masks but met unfathomable resistance from people who were trained in health but evidently not adequately educated in science.
With that as a preface, it is clear that I am not anti-mask but — because I can think scientifically and logically — I acknowledge their drawbacks that mask proponents attempt to camouflage by cherry-picking data and using strawman fallacies, such as by claiming that “wearing a mask doesn't cause CO2 poisoning” and saying “the public should not believe that masks kill.”
Eating a pound of sugar per day for months won't likely poison or kill you, but that doesn't mean sugar is harmless. While masks don't kill, they indisputably have drawbacks. For example, researchers found that elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels can trigger anxiety and panic as well as impair cognition, especially more complex thinking (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9).
Example: “Relative to 600 ppm, at 1,000 ppm CO2, moderate and statistically significant decrements occurred in six of nine scales of decision-making performance. At 2,500 ppm, large and statistically significant reductions occurred in seven scales of decision-making performance …”
Other scientists reported that “Human experimental studies have suggested that short-term CO2 exposure beginning at 1000 ppm affects cognitive performances including decision making and problem resolution.” (emphasis added)
During the pandemic, we've witnessed numerous examples of previously normal people doing crazy things, such as outbursts and even violent behavior on commercial airline flights. This has commonly been attributed to pandemic stress yet mask-induced elevations in CO2 may have contributed to poor judgment.
Studies found that “student performance suffers and people have trouble making decisions as carbon dioxide levels rise.” Professor Jose-Luis Jimenez, an aerosol scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder who earned his Ph.D. at MIT, said “We get dumber when there is high CO2.” He added that “ideally, indoor air shouldn't get much above 700 parts per million of CO2.” Outside air contains about 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide.
Scientists reported that “use of face masks (KN95 and valved-respirator) resulted in significant increases in CO2 concentrations,” such as a “10-fold increase in CO2 with KN95 respirator and valved-respirator or 24,000–26,000 PPM at the nasolabial fold, which is greater than the NIOSH 8-h TLV-REL of 5000 PPM.”
- Yale Climate Connections July 27, 2016: Indoor CO2: Dumb and dumber?
Excerpt: “Three recent studies of people breathing indoors have documented subtle declines in thinking ability when carbon dioxide increases to 1,000 ppm … There were ‘moderate’ declines in decision making performance at 1,000 ppm compared to 600 ppm. At 2,500 ppm, the drop in mental capacity was ‘astonishingly large.’ [Other researchers] measured a 15 percent decline of cognitive ability scores at 950 ppm and 50 percent declines at 1,400 ppm.”
- The Atlantic December 20, 2019: The Human Brain Evolved When Carbon Dioxide Was Lower: There is substantial but inconsistent evidence that as carbon-dioxide levels rise, they could affect human cognition.
- October 26, 2015: Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments
Excerpt: “Cognitive function scores were significantly better under Green+ building conditions than in the Conventional building conditions for all nine functional domains. These findings have wide-ranging implications because this study was designed to reflect conditions that are commonly encountered every day in many indoor environments.”
- May 24, 2021: Study links classroom ventilation, air quality with academic performance
- August 23, 2021: N95 respirator mask breathing leads to excessive carbon dioxide inhalation and reduced heat transfer in a human nasal cavity
- 2013: Carbon dioxide rebreathing in respiratory protective devices: influence of speech and work rate in full-face masks
- April 14, 2021: Poor air quality in classrooms detrimental to wellbeing and learning
Excerpt: “Previous research conducted by UNSW Professor Mat Santamouris found CO2 levels of up to 4000ppm in classrooms, more than four times the recommended threshold. ‘Under these conditions, both the teacher and the students are sleepy and tired, and their learning capacity is reduced tremendously,’ Professor Santamouris said.”
- January 19, 2022: How the COVID-19 pandemic might age us: Infectious disease, loneliness and stress can affect cellular ageing, making us less healthy and shortening lifespans.
- January 19, 2022: I'm an ER nurse who's comforted panicked COVID-19 patients as they beg to live. Too often, they die anyway.
Excerpt: “Upon arrival I … don an N95 mask topped by a surgical mask … Within minutes …, I find it hard to breathe.”
- February 1, 2022: Masks and other pandemic measures are needed at school, but can make it harder to hear in classrooms
- February 21, 2022: Face masks found to impair nonverbal communication between individuals
Comment: The extraordinary expressivity of human faces evolved because that is critical to communication. Masking that with masks substantially impairs this key component to civilization.
- March 1, 2022: Cloth masks inferior for protection against airborne viral spread
So 4000 ppm is detrimental and 24,000 is not? Only in the minds of those who ignore what various scientists have reported: that elevated carbon dioxide levels indeed have negative effects.
Yet I still believe that COVID-19 poses a greater risk than masks for most individuals. However, that doesn't mean people are forced to choose between masks and nothing because my technology can reduce SARS-CoV-2 exposure much better than masks and can markedly reduce indoor CO2 concentration as well as minimizing exposure to air pollution that has numerous adverse physical and mental effects. Notably, even good-quality masks worn by most healthcare personnel do little to shield from air pollution.
However, there is more in exhaled breath than carbon dioxide; it also contains many VOCs (volatile organic compounds), and it is likely better to dissipate them than to rebreathe them, as would happen if masks retain them.
Do they? To test this, I donned a 3M 8511 N95 mask (which includes an exhalation valve, therefore traps less exhaled gases than other N95 masks) and inserted an electronic VOC sensor into the air space between my face and the mask. I watched in amazement as the readings quickly skyrocketed from roughly 100 – 150 ppb (ambient air) to well over 10,000 ppb. In contrast, holding the sensor roughly one inch in front of my nostrils while quietly breathing resulted in readings of approximately 2000 ppb. I wouldn't draw many conclusions from that until I factor in temperature and humidity (raw sensor readings are susceptible to both), but this rough test suggests that masks partially retain some exhaled gases, not surprisingly.
- October 25, 2021: Particle leakage through the exhalation valve on a face mask under flow conditions mimicking human breathing: A critical assessment
Excerpt: “… we find solid evidence and mechanisms of particle leakage across the valve … Since the inevitable limitations resulting from the basic structure of an exhalation valve with a flapping motion have been confirmed, it is necessary to develop a better exhalation valve to promote both safety and convenience.”
- The micro-environmental impact of volatile organic compound emissions from large-scale assemblies of people in a confined space
- Volatile Organic Compounds In Normal Human Exhaled Breath: A Long Neglected Pollutant Source
- Human Breathomics Database
One of the hallmarks of intelligence is not just knowing something but how quickly it is mentally grasped. Schoolchildren now know that E = mc2, but it took Albert Einstein to initially realize the equivalence of mass and energy. This pandemic is providing a real-world IQ test revealing how swiftly people comprehend crucial information and how rapidly they spot the usefulness of innovations that provide better results than existing alternatives such as masks that reduce SARS-CoV-2 exposure but usually not enough.
Ditto for the six-foot social distancing guideline that was based on politics, not science. Ditto for vaccines that permit too many infections, such as how “70% of fully vaccinated prisoners caught COVID-19 in a Texas Delta outbreak” or “This 900-person delta cluster in Mass. has CDC freaked out—74% are vaccinated.” Numerous other examples corroborate how COVID-19 infections often result in spite of vaccination. Consequently, smart people realize that vaccines won't be enough:
- New York Times January 24, 2021: Why Vaccines Alone Will Not End the Pandemic
- January 26, 2021: Vaccines alone will not end the pandemic, Columbia University model shows
- January 4, 2021: Opinion: There is only a slim chance that the vaccine will stop the COVID pandemic this year
- February 7, 2021: Top WHO official says vaccines alone "not enough" to defeat COVID-19
- Scientific American February 7, 2021: Vaccines Alone Are Not Enough to Beat COVID: It could take years to immunize everyone, so we need to work on discovering new treatments as well—and fast
- March 10, 2021: COVID herd immunity may be unlikely—winter surges could “become the norm”
- August 13, 2021: Covid-19: Why we can't count on herd immunity for protection
Comment: Why we can't count on vaccines: Another compelling reason to not make vaccines our primary preventive strategy: while pandemics threaten us individually, they also strategically imperil nations. If Adolf Hitler could have engineered a very deadly virus and developed an effective vaccine for it, he could have ruled the world without firing a shot by immunizing Germans before unleashing the pathogen. Unfortunately, some current rulers are just as diabolical as Hitler. If they weren't previously considering biological warfare, this pandemic surely planted that possibility in their minds.
- Stating the obvious: March 10, 2021: Vaccination isn't the quick coronavirus solution many of us hoped for
- March 18, 2021: Nature: Five reasons why COVID herd immunity is probably impossible: Even with vaccination efforts in full force, the theoretical threshold for vanquishing COVID-19 looks to be out of reach.
- March 18, 2021: Georgetown University Medical Center: Vaccines alone may not be enough to end pandemic
- The New York Times May 3, 2021: Reaching ‘Herd Immunity’ Is Unlikely in the U.S., Experts Now Believe: Widely circulating coronavirus variants and persistent hesitancy about vaccines will keep the goal out of reach. The virus is here to stay, but vaccinating the most vulnerable may be enough to restore normalcy.
- May 12, 2021: World's Most Vaccinated Nation Is Spooked by Covid Spike: Seychelles has seen a surge in coronavirus cases even though much of its population was inoculated with China's Sinopharm vaccine.
- June 13, 2021: The Doctor Who Eliminated Smallpox Says COVID-19 Is Here to Stay: Dr. Larry Brilliant spoke with Harry Siegel about why it's too late to hope for herd immunity despite the “magic” of vaccines, and much more.
- June 22, 2021: Israel faces Covid surge as virus circulates even among vaccinated: Delta variant blamed after clusters identified around schools …
- June 26, 2021: WHO says fully vaccinated people should continue to wear masks because of Delta variant spread
- July 6, 2021: 800 people claimed they were 'COVID-free' or vaccinated for a dance party in the Netherlands. Now 180 people have tested positive.
- July 13, 2021: Covid outbreak among vaccinated Vegas hospital workers underscores Delta risks
- July 15, 2021: 964 people got COVID-19 after an outdoor music festival, despite compulsory negative tests, vaccines, or other proof of immunity
- July 20, 2021: Delta goes to Washington, infects vaccinated Capitol staffers
- July 21, 2021: The New COVID Panic: What vaccinated people should really know about their risk from the delta variant.
Comment: A journalist who believed that breakthrough cases were rare and mild attended a family reunion in which everyone was fully vaccinated yet every adult there contracted COVID-19, which made him miserable. He worries that “vaccinated people are not quite as in the clear as many of us seem to think we are.”
- July 31, 2021: 2 major San Francisco hospitals reported that 233 staff members tested positive for COVID-19
Excerpt: “Most of those staff members were vaccinated …”
- August 21, 2021: Former Kentucky lawmaker dies of COVID-19 despite being fully vaccinated
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine epidemiologist Allan Massie August 3, 2021: I went to a party with 14 other vaccinated people; 11 of us got COVID
Excerpt: “… I can tell you that even a ‘mild’ case of COVID-19 is pretty miserable. I've had fever, chills and muscle aches, and I've been weak enough that I can barely get out of bed. … The CDC announced in May that it was only going to collect data on breakthrough infections that led to hospitalization or death … But that means that outbreaks like ours will fly under the radar. Any of us could infect others, apparently including other vaccinated people. … But apparently, whether because of variants or fading immunity, being ‘fully vaccinated’ doesn't necessarily mean you're immune.”
Comment: FULLY VACCINATED DOESN'T MEAN FULLY PROTECTED.
- August 4, 2021: Research shows many with mild COVID-19 infections still experience long-term symptoms
Based on: Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in a non-hospitalized cohort: Results from the Arizona CoVHORT
- August 8, 2021: What Iceland's rising Covid-19 case count tells us about vaccine efficacy
Excerpt: “In Iceland, 96% of females and 90% of males 16 years or older have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. Its vaccination rate … [is] one of the highest in the world … Yet tests show an alarming number of domestic Covid-19 infections are still happening with the onset of the delta variant. In the US, where vaccination rates are lower, officials have described the virus's ongoing spread as a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” But given the lopsided numbers of vaccinated versus unvaccinated people in Iceland, the island country is currently seeing more cases of Covid-19 among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.”
- August 13, 2021: I was a breakthrough case. Here's what ‘mild COVID’ was like for me.
- The Washington Post: They're called mild cases. But people with breakthrough covid can still feel pretty sick.
- September 1, 2021: NEJM: Resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Highly Vaccinated Health System Workforce
Related: NPR September 12, 2021: I Got A 'Mild' Breakthrough Case. Here's What I Wish I'd Known
Excerpt: “In the U.S., a study published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine concluded that vaccine effectiveness ‘against any symptomatic disease is considerably lower against the delta variant,’ dropping from over 90% earlier in the year before delta was the predominant strain to only about 65% in July. Research on breakthrough infections over the summer in New York found the vaccines were still overall about 80% effective against any infection. Each study has its limits.”
- July 27, 2021: CDC: The coronavirus could be 'just a few mutations' away from evading vaccines
- August 1, 2021: Coronavirus transmission among vaccinated people could raise the risk of an even more dangerous variant
- August 4, 2021: As the more contagious delta variant circulates, public health experts say herd immunity has become an even more distant goal: Experts are now saying up to 85% or 90% of the population will need to be immune to the virus for herd immunity to take hold
- August 11, 2021: New data on coronavirus vaccine effectiveness may be "a wakeup call"
Excerpt: “Moderna was 76% effective against infection, and Pfizer was only 42% effective.”
Based on: Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence
- August 11, 2021: The developer of the AstraZeneca shot says the Delta variant has made herd immunity impossible because vaccinated people can still transmit the virus
- August 14, 2021: I'm An Infectious Disease Doctor Yet I Couldn't Protect My Family From The Delta Variant
- August 16, 2021: As Covid Cases Spread, Vaccines Won't Be Enough
- August 17, 2021: Covid-19: Lockdown not enough to stop Australia's delta variant crisis
- August 24, 2021: Ultra-Vaxxed Israel's Crisis Is a Dire Warning to America
- August 24, 2021: New Zealand locked down after a single COVID-19 case. Now 148 people are infected, and experts are worried
- Transmission event of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant reveals multiple vaccine breakthrough infections
- CDC: Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings – Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021
- September 6, 2021: Peter J. Hotez, M.D., Ph.D., Dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine: The Latest COVID-19 Surge Is Just the Start of a New Nightmare
- September 7, 2021: U.S. COVID-19 case tally tops 40 million, and hospitalizations over Labor Day holiday were more than double last year's
- September 3, 2021: U.S. heads into Labor Day with Covid vaccines but a substantially worse outbreak than this time last year
- August 26, 2021: U.S. COVID summer surge worse than last year with average of 140,000 daily infections
- August 26, 2021: Despite Increase in Vaccinations, COVID-19 Continues to Surge in US
- September 7, 2021: COVID cases up more than 3 times vs. one year ago
- August 12, 2021: US in ‘much worse situation’ with COVID-19 pandemic than expected, experts say
- September 9, 2021: U.S. averaging 1,500 COVID deaths a day for first time since March
- September 13, 2021: The Covid spike in highly vaccinated Israel holds grim omens for other economies
- September 14, 2021: Fauci warns of possible 'monster' variant of COVID if pandemic isn't stamped out with vaccinations
- September 8, 2021: COVID-19 surge in the US: The summer of hope ends in gloom
- September 21, 2021: Vermont Covid Stats Could Tell Us Where We're Going
Excerpt: “Vermont has 88% of adults and 99% of everyone over 65 at least partially vaccinated … [so it is] the most vaccinated state in the United States … [yet] right now they have broken through the levels that existed during the fall and spring surges …”
Unlike typical infections from which you fully recover — or think you do, as I discussed in the videos — COVID-19 can inflict various types of long-term damage, including that affecting the brain:
- January 13, 2022: Blood markers of brain cell damage higher over short term in COVID-19 patients than in Alzheimer's patients, study finds
- April 8, 2021: Experts alarmed by number of COVID survivors with brain disorders
- January 18, 2022: Mild COVID cases still lead to attention and memory issues - study
- January 6, 2022: Pandemic may affect infants' brain development; coronavirus can trigger kidney scarring
- January 12, 2022: The COVID generation: how is the pandemic affecting kids’ brains?
Excerpt: “… infants born during the pandemic scored lower … on tests of gross motor, fine motor and communication skills compared with those born before it … It didn't matter whether their birth parent had been infected with the virus or not; there seemed to be something about the environment of the pandemic itself. [Pediatrician Dr. Dani] Dumitriu was stunned. ‘We were like, oh, my God,’ she recalled. ‘We're talking about hundreds of millions of babies.’”
- July 29, 2021: Covid-19 could lead to cognitive decline, especially among older adults, new research suggests
- October 23, 2021: People who've had COVID-19 are facing memory problems months after contracting the disease, new study says: 'They can't think'
- July 30, 2021: CDC report shows mounting evidence about dangerous delta variant; researchers study possible link between virus, dementia …
Excerpt: “[The report] shows that those who are vaccinated are three times less likely to get COVID-19 than those who are unvaccinated. Once infected, though, vaccinated people are just as contagious as someone without that protection — meaning they need to wear a mask and keep their distance to avoid passing on the virus.”
- A 15-year-old described what it's like to have long COVID, from forgetting the previous day's schoolwork to sitting in the shower to avoid fainting
- Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19
Excerpt: “People who had recovered from COVID-19, including those no longer reporting symptoms, exhibited significant cognitive deficits … [even in] non-hospitalised cases … the 0.47 SD [standard deviation] global composite score reduction for the hospitalized with ventilator sub-group … equates to a 7-point difference in IQ.”
- Will COVID-19 have long-term effects on the brain?
Excerpt: “An exhaustive review of scientific papers … reveals ‘convincing evidence’ that SARS-CoV-2 can … contribute to the development — or worsening — of Alzheimer's disease …”
- February 3, 2022: Small study finds Alzheimer's-like changes in some COVID patients' brains
- Cognitive neuroscientist Jessica Bernard, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University: September 24, 2021: Preliminary research finds that even mild cases of COVID-19 leave a mark on the brain – but it's not yet clear how long it lasts
Comment: Significant anatomical and functional changes were seen in COVID-19 survivors, alarmingly with equal damage resulting in people with “mild” infections as well as those with serious disease requiring hospitalization.
- November 10, 2021: How COVID Might Sow Chaos in the Brain: SARS-CoV-2 appears to travel widely across the cerebral cortex
Excerpt: “One study showed that more than 80 percent of COVID patients encountered neurological complications. … Electroencephalography measurements … revealed that even mild COVID cases can lead to altered brain activity. … A composite measure of brainwave strength was lower in the COVID group than in the control participants when assessed, on average, four months later. Some of the aberrant signaling had resolved at eight months in those who had tested positive for COVID. But that group as a whole still had lower readings for some measurements; the combination of COVID and social distancing may have had lingering consequences. ‘The direct effect COVID seems to have on EEG power is analogous to effects that we see when people are diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment, which can develop into Alzheimer's disease and related dementias,’ says Allison B. Sekuler, senior scientist at the Rotman Research Institute.”
Comment: A relative who trivialized COVID-19 developed it, which triggered a delirium in which she lost bowel and bladder control, forgot her name and address, forgot to eat, and for several days didn't realize she was hospitalized. After discharge, she was unable to work and had to relearn how to use her phone.
- What doesn't kill you makes you dumber: Strengthening the link between infectious disease, intelligence and personality
According to Massachusetts General Hospital researchers, SARS-CoV-2 increases the risk of stillbirth. In the decades to come, we will discover more of what it does to children who survive.
COVID-19 has infected multiple animal species. They won't wear masks, practice social distancing, or be coerced into vaccinations and booster shots, but they will generate new variants that may spread back into humans and give us yet another nightmare by being more transmissible and deadly. The technology I developed is the only feasible way to reliably protect us from all future variants and the ever-present threat of the next pandemic.
People are not wired for nonstop uncertainty, but the pandemic delivered endless risk, with any of the hundreds of people you encounter daily potentially able to infect you — even if you and they are vaccinated. That risk can be ignored or trivialized but not eliminated by anything except my technology.
Transportation evolved from walking to riding horses then trains, cars, and planes. The advantages of some innovations are readily apparent and hence quickly adopted whereas in others, having solutions undermines the incentive to search for better ones. Because masks, social distancing, vaccines, and even lockdowns failed to adequately control the pandemic, thinking they will now is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic and expecting a better outcome. We need more reliable ways to safeguard us from all airborne infectious diseases, so I developed them.
With masks, social distancing, and vaccines failing to do enough, thinking people should welcome my technology that adds a crucial layer of protection.
The American Hospital Association advised that “masks are still needed in hospitals and other health care settings” even “if you are fully vaccinated.” Unfortunately, the noxiousness of wearing a mask 8 to 12 hours per day contributes to the burnout nurses are experiencing at my local hospital, and likely yours, too. With nurses at the breaking point (1, 2, 3, 4), expecting them to wear masks indefinitely isn't realistic.
Related November 3, 2021: Trust Us: Nurses Are at the Breaking Point: The pandemic has brought the nursing profession into crisis; the solution is in the public's hands. You think it's bad when restaurants are short-staffed? Imagine what would happen if nurses fed up with being treated like second-class citizens walked off the job: patients would suffer and die, and administrators might regret viciously resisting wage increases enabling nurses to keep up with inflation. They might also regret not doing more to address some of the many problems nurses face daily.
The next section, on my experiences with respiratory gas alterations, is crucially relevant to YOU and making the world a better place by following advice from Thomas Edison, who excelled in solving problems.
Respiratory gas alterations
My experiences with respiratory gas alterations
I enjoy performing surgery but chose another specialty because wearing surgical masks adversely affected my thinking, perhaps because I paid for college and medical school by working in a job that damaged my lungs, diminishing their reserve capacity.
To protect my lungs, I routinely wear an N95 or better mask while mowing with a large (30-inch wide), heavy mower up and down hills so steep it would slide downhill if I followed the usual advice to sidehill while cutting on slopes. That Toro® mower is self-propelled but slips while ascending hills, compelling me to apply significant force.
Initially, it's not too bad, but when I begin huffing and puffing with the mask visibly crumpling with every inhalation, I feel anxious and sometimes even panicky, as if I can't get enough air and can't wait to rip the mask off my face. Then it gets worse when the mask is soaked with sweat.
Then I wonder how much worse it must be for people in hot, humid areas. Then I wonder about what Thomas Edison said: that there must be a better way: and there is: my method to safeguard air can protect people anywhere, including while mowing. Or eating, working, walking, in school, visiting the dentist, etc.
Thinking of research linking respiratory gas (e.g., carbon dioxide) alteration with impaired judgment reminds me of the mistakes I made during the many months I spent in Class IV heart failure, constantly short of breath, even at rest. Our judgmental culture is eager to lambaste people for blunders — and now, with the Internet, to never forget. The assumption by people not trained in medicine is: “that is you.” In reality, that can be just another manifestation of a physical problem — in this case, not getting enough oxygen to my brain for it to function normally.
Working as an ER doctor, I had a ringside seat witnessing similar behavioral alterations affecting everyone from prominent businessmen and celebrities to ordinary folks of all ages. None of this is a surprise to people who understand neuroscience and neurology. By digging deep into them and spending many years scouring the medical literature, I discovered some intriguing information and connected the dots to understand, for example, why a historically disadvantaged group is plagued by increased criminal propensity, lower IQ, and substantially lower average income. In my book, problems are just problems to be solved, and I think I can in this case by understanding their roots, which highlights their solutions as being obvious.
Obvious — that is, obvious to those who can connect the dots but evidently not “experts” who have equal access to the medical literature yet are too complacent to fully avail themselves of it. And as they rest on their laurels, human potential is needlessly wasted. I intend to correct that.
One possible impediment is not biological but social with the cancel culture making some people sacrosanct, as if difficulties statistically associated with them cannot be publicly discussed even if that is motivated by a sincere desire to help, not criticize. This is but one of many harms stemming from the cancel culture, which has everyone walking on eggshells and censoring themselves, which — as scientists documented — damages us physically and mentally, including by impairing cognition. Conceivably, this might help explain why the Flynn effect is plateauing and even regressing (1, 2, 3).
The cancel culture may seem to be an unstoppable cultural plague but I conceived a way to neutralize them and restore free speech, which is the ultimate foundation of other freedoms.
Notably, Flynn effect regression isn't limited to those in the bottom half of the IQ bell curve.* During the pandemic, for example, we've witnessed prominent experts make shockingly egregious mistakes, such as discouraging mask utilization after which they were pressured into recommending DIY masks but stupidly advised using some of the worst possible fabrics.
What they should have done is what I did early in the pandemic: make a device that scientifically analyzed fabric filtering performance in single and multiple layers to find those most able to help overcome the filter media shortage. Interestingly, researchers later found that certain combinations of common fabrics sometimes outperform N95 masks.
*Relevant to that:
- Professor Robert J. Sternberg (fascinating man!): Why Real-World Problems Go Unresolved and What We Can Do about It: Inferences from a Limited-Resource Model of Successful Intelligence
Excerpt: “… despite worldwide increases in IQ since the beginning of the 20th century, there are so many unresolved and dramatic problems in the world.”
- Robert J. Sternberg: Speculations on the Role of Successful Intelligence in Solving Contemporary World Problems
- Robert J. Sternberg: A Theory of Adaptive Intelligence and Its Relation to General Intelligence
- Robert J. Sternberg: Rethinking what we mean by intelligence
- Robert J. Sternberg: COVID-19 Has Taught Us What Intelligence Really Is
- Diane F. Halpern and Dana S. Dunn: Critical Thinking: A Model of Intelligence for Solving Real-World Problems
Excerpt: “Most theories of intelligence do not directly address the question of whether people with high intelligence can successfully solve real world problems.”
- James Kaufman: Creativity as a Stepping Stone toward a Brighter Future
Excerpt: “If IQs continue to rise over generation, why has the world been unable to solve basic recurrent problems? This paper argues that creativity, which is overlooked in IQ tests and showing no signs of a similar increase, may be part of the reason of why the Flynn Effect has not led to a better world.”
Comment: The trillion-dollar question that Ivy League universities and Stanford cannot answer is where creativity comes from and specifically how to foster it. This ability is latent in everyone but usually suppressed by educational and occupational systems that prioritize obedience and mimicry: doing what others say and do — or else. Our society gives lip service to celebrating creativity but “the pioneers take the most arrows.”
- Coronavirus: Global GDP to sink by $22 trillion over COVID, says IMF: Although economists expect a strong rebound this year, losses are still projected to be in the tens of trillions between 2020 and 2025. IMF chief Gita Gopinath said the pandemic is causing "severe damage."
- Pandemic will cause globe $US21 trillion in economic pain
Excerpt: “The global economy could lose up to $US21.8 trillion dollars in 2020 alone due to COVID-19 …”
- $82 trillion over 5 years? Cambridge study counts the cost of coronavirus
- February 4, 2022: Preventing pandemics costs far less than controlling them
“Creativity is the most powerful competitive advantage a business can have. Companies need to fizz with new ideas and fresh thinking. But there's a problem — there just aren't enough fizzy people around.”
— Tham Khai Meng, co-chairman and worldwide chief creative officer of Ogilvy & Mather (source)
Relevant to that, I aced college and the MCAT exam, doing so well I was the one person accepted into my medical school class of 256 students with just three years of college. I graduated at the very top of my class in medical school, yet even though I dearly wanted to innovate, I lacked the creativity to do that, going decade after decade generating nothing more than trivial solutions to small problems. Then I serendipitously discovered catalysts to amplify creativity, flooding me with thousands of ideas to solve problems, including some of the most pressing ones in the world. The bottom line is that I am now very creative but previously wasn't.
By helping others unlock their creative potential, we could solve one of the world's most fundamental problems: there is no shortage of intellectual wattage but rarely do brilliant people generate novel ideas to solve big problems. Instead, even small problems often go unsolved as the overall list of problems has grown into a mountain of difficulties plaguing everyday life.
In the United States, this has evolved into a national sport of attacking other Americans as if they are the problem, yet as we become increasingly adept at hammering others, no problems are solved other than giving our enemies cause for celebration. United we stand, divided we fall.
Now another way in which all of this is relevant to you: decades after teetering on the edge of death with Class IV heart failure — when most class IV heart failure patients would have died even with the supposedly best treatment (1, 2) — I am in better shape than most people one-third my age and transcended my prior baseline, now able to outwork many teenagers and perform hard physical work all day long, loving every minute — except while wearing a mask.
Crucially, I achieved that recovery on my own without modern medicine that is simultaneously wonderful yet woefully unable to help most people with common problems overcome them, whether they are physical difficulties or emotional/cognitive limitations.
What doctors and other healthcare practitioners can do for patients is both a godsend and very disappointing in that they can't do more for more folks, with one example being the inability of the medical profession to solve the epidemic of burnout, depression, and suicide plaguing doctors. I know many of them, and few are happy, most doing their best to camouflage their angst, which necessitates self-censoring to present a palatably professional veneer to the world even though that self-silencing process damages them physically and mentally.
They can't help themselves in this and many other ways (such as being overweight), but they can help you? Does. Not. Compute.
As Edison suggested, there is a better way. He said, “The doctor of the future will give no medicine, but will instruct his patient in the care of the human frame, in diet and in the cause and prevention of disease.”
He was partially wrong in that medicines will still be needed, but mostly correct in highlighting how prevention can obviate the need for most medical care and the misery associated with it as people prematurely succumb to countless preventable problems.
Edison was not familiar with the word “exposome” that continues to be a mystery to most people and even physicians who fail to grasp how ignoring over 99% of possible preventive measures inevitably results in many physical and mental problems that cannot be fully reversed with pharmaceuticals or surgery. I will prove that beyond any reasonable doubt in an upcoming book that is now thousands of pages long and growing every day, filled with numerous real-world examples of how people doom themselves by failing to dodge avoidable problems. Edison was correct: there is a better way.
The air you breathe is part of your exposome. The primary approaches to this pandemic — masks, inadequate social distancing, and iffy vaccines — are premised on the hope that they can somehow prevent infections resulting from breathing contaminated air. As I mentioned in the introductory video near the top of this page, that is a very stupid approach.
Instead, it makes much more sense to breathe clean air free of not only the coronavirus but also other airborne pathogens and air pollution that, as I hinted throughout this website and the videos, damages us physically and mentally in numerous ways that the medical profession has yet to fully grasp even though the medical literature superbly documents the imperative to better address the ultimate roots of those problems.
Doctors now strapped for time don't have time to learn everything they should know about the exposome, so I am endeavoring to encapsulate that information in a new medical specialty and to distill it into technological solutions so that anyone can function as the “doctor of the future” as Edison imagined, helping them achieve better physical and mental health than they can by thinking that pharmaceuticals and surgery are sufficient foundations of health.
New ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases
We need new approaches to prevent and treat infectious diseases. Everyone knows of the ongoing problem with antimicrobial resistance and doctors realize that some infections don't respond well to conventional medical therapy, such as drugs and occasionally surgery to drain abscesses.
I had such a problem many years ago and repeatedly tried oral and topical antibiotics as well as surgical drainage, which left me so frustrated I developed a new approach that evolved into a device forming the basis of my first patent. Its effects stem from two principles, one of which is rapidly stimulating natural immunity, which is crucially important because the outcome of infections can hinge on how quickly the immune system responds: too slowly, and germs get the upper hand.
This battle goes on every minute of your life. Natural immunity is so effective that people require antibiotics (and other antimicrobials) for only a very small percentage of their pathogen exposures. Nevertheless, such drugs are frequently used and often expensive as well as fraught with side effects and not uncommonly disappointing efficacy.
I wanted something better, so I developed it and after years of testing, it has never failed to quickly eradicate the infection. The cost per treatment is negligible (less than one penny) and the device itself could be inexpensive and very portable. I use mine — currently the only one in the world; more about that in a minute — to treat infections and prevent them, such as on cuts or scrapes, especially when they are contaminated with yucky stuff, to put it colloquially. Again, its batting average is still 100%.
My device can also accelerate healing because immunity is integral to that process (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). As Harvard Medical School's Christopher Garris put it, “immune cells are chief orchestrators of healing.” It can also strongly modulate itching and pain. When I itch, I no longer reach for some topical goop or Benadryl® (diphenhydramine) because my device works better, faster, and doesn't have side effects such as dry mouth or sleepiness, plus it is cheaper and I never run out.
I'm not satisfied with that, though, so I designed something that utilizes the same operational principles (hence it will work equally well) but is — well, I haven't yet filed for a patent on it so I won't divulge any secrets, but it is Star Trek cool, bound to cause jaws to drop in amazement.
Having thought of that many years ago, why haven't I done anything with it? My first patent was paid for by an innovation think tank that devoted so little money to marketing it predictably fizzled. Before that happened, it spun off many of its innovations to what strike me as shell corporations, including the one that owns most of the rights to my patent, with me owning the remainder. If that were my only idea I would have marketed it promptly, but I have countless other projects, including several focused on blocking airborne pathogen transmission.
Last fall, well over a decade after I first conceived the idea leading to my first patent, I spotted an article in which researchers revealed how the operative principle I used indeed boosted the speed and degree of the early immune response, thus further corroborating that my seemingly crazy idea has merit.
My ultimate boss at that innovation think tank was fond of saying that crazy ideas sometimes work. Indeed they do, and every major advance begins with a seemingly crazy idea that others missed.
I have a long list of others. One of them is a nifty way to quickly switch off appetite — not permanently, of course, but for up to a few hours, long enough so you could skip a meal and eventually lose weight without being tormented by hunger. I know all about that, because I once was alarmingly overweight, so addicted to yummy food I couldn't resist stuffing myself several times per day. Aided by innovation, I quickly lost that weight and have effortlessly kept it off for decades, maintaining what is usually a 31-inch waistline without drugs, herbs, or dieting, something I refuse to do, cognizant that I lack sufficient willpower.
At the beginning of this page I mentioned how foolish it would be if people designed and built their own car brakes. While that is true for almost everyone, it wasn't for me because I had a crazy idea that I could markedly improve automotive steering and braking on everything from dry pavement to the most challenging conditions, such as wet glare ice. Not just a bit better, but stopping in a small fraction of the usual distance.
I had that idea bouncing around inside my head for years when I heard about a local teenager killed when the driver — her date — turned in front of an oncoming vehicle as they headed for the County Fair. This angered me enough that I put aside other projects and built various prototypes, testing them over the next few years on paved and unpaved surfaces in all conditions: dry, wet, snowy, slushy, and icy.
Amazed by the results, I made a short video documenting the performance but never did anything with it, discouraged by hearing one too many stories that automakers are not interested in ideas generated by outsiders, or at least not interested in paying for them — tragically, because as Marina Bolotnikova reported in America's car crash epidemic, “driving is the most dangerous thing most Americans do every day” (wrong; breathing is), killing tens of thousands of people and severely injuring millions more, creating a public health crisis manifesting the need for a much better way to control automotive steering and braking. Automakers have no giant breakthroughs in those departments, but I do and have the evidence to prove it.
Because that technology could help prevent most automotive fatalities, whatever I hear of one, I think of how needless it was. But our innovation system is broken, lavishly funding trivial ideas such as more messaging apps we don't need while neglecting innovators such as myself who generate meritorious ideas that collect dust. As Edison said, there must be a better way.
Failing to prepare: a titanic mistake
- By The Atlantic superstar Ed Yong September 29, 2021: We're Already Barreling Toward the Next Pandemic: This one is far from over, but the window to prepare for future threats is closing fast.
Excerpt: “With every new pathogen—cholera in the 1830s, HIV in the 1980s—Americans rediscover the weaknesses in the country's health system, briefly attempt to address the problem, and then ‘let our interest lapse when the immediate crisis seems to be over,’ Fee and Brown wrote.”
- Elizabeth Fee and Theodore M. Brown November/December 2002: The Unfulfilled Promise Of Public Health: Déjà Vu All Over Again
Excerpt: “We have failed to sustain [public health] progress in any coherent manner. If we do not wish to repeat past mistakes, we should learn lessons from the past to guide us in the future.”
- World Health Organization October 1, 2021: The best time to prevent the next pandemic is now: countries join voices for better emergency preparedness
- March 11, 2021: ‘Never again’: the race to prevent the next pandemic: Another pandemic is inevitable. But there are things that can be done to lessen its impact – and we must start now, experts say
- By Tom Frieden (CDC Director 2009 – 2017) February 12, 2021: Will We Be Ready for the Next Pandemic? The world must move urgently in 2021 to develop strategies and systems for fighting diseases that could be even deadlier than Covid-19
- Wired magazine May 5, 2021: It's Already Time to Stop the Next Pandemic. Can a Prize Help?
Comment: Yes. I have no shortage of ideas, but no more money to further develop them. Ideas on paper or prototypes in my garage can't prevent disease and save lives; commercializing innovations requires money and hence people willing to invest it to solve big problems that will inevitably otherwise haunt us.
- November 8, 2021: The US was not prepared for a pandemic. Free market capitalism and government deregulation may be to blame
Excerpt: “It's unclear when the pandemic will come to an end. What may be an even more important question is whether the U.S. will be prepared for the next one. The past year and a half suggests that the answer may be no.”
Comment: The Biden administration initially proposed $30 billion to address pandemic preparedness but slashed that to $2.7 billion with “roughly half of that sum is dedicated to modernizing CDC laboratories, a vital endeavor, but not a core component of the administration's preparedness agenda.” In contrast, his budget deal includes $555 billion for climate measures (1, 2) — 205 times as much.
- October 29, 2021: Congress Decides to Learn Almost Nothing From the Pandemic
- August 3, 2021: Congress Is Slashing a $30 Billion Plan to Fight the Next Pandemic
Stephen Colbert joked about a crew member on the sinking Titanic announcing he would “look out for icebergs now.” Unfortunately, this mindset permeates our culture as people respond to disasters instead of preventing them.
Heeding the “always be prepared” motto is wise. Bill Gates gave a TED talk in March of 2015 warning that we weren't prepared for the next outbreak. We heard his words, but the world didn't get the message. As a result, the greatest potentially preventable disaster in history was not prevented.
Even if vaccines eventually end the COVID-19 crisis, they will do nothing to prevent the next pandemic and subsequent ones. Scientists will scramble to develop vaccines and other drugs but after many decades of trying, we have no good pharmaceutical approaches to prevent or treat many airborne infectious diseases. Sooner or later, one will emerge that is highly infectious and so lethal it could kill billions of people.
My technology could prevent that, but we don't need to learn that painful lesson before we get serious about infectious disease prevention. We already have plenty of good reasons, beginning with influenza and “colds” and ending with the stark reality that infections trigger countless problems, including birth defects, impaired cognition, accelerated aging, and reduced lifespan. The videos posted on this page provide more examples of the price we pay for trivializing prevention.
- February 1, 2022: First virus infection linked with infections later in life
Excerpt: “Asymptomatic viral infections in the first days and weeks of a baby's life are associated with an increased risk of respiratory infections later in life, research suggests.”
Comment: If it spreads by air, my technology can prevent it.
My upcoming book focusing on the exposome and other aspects of prevention is already about 18 times longer than an average book because we neglect or trivialize most preventable problems, then belatedly discover that pharmaceuticals and surgery usually cannot fully reverse all of the damage. As a result, most deaths are premature, lopping years to decades off our lives yet with few realizing this because others make the same mistakes, reducing average lifespan and sometimes radically shortening it, such as a friend who graduated from Notre Dame, became an engineer, married, had children and a storybook life until she died at age 30 from an infection transmitted via the air.
COVID-19 can affect the central nervous system producing damage that manifests in various ways, including stroke and new-onset psychosis (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). History tidbit: “Past pandemics have demonstrated that diverse types of neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as encephalopathy, mood changes, psychosis, neuromuscular dysfunction, or demyelinating processes, may accompany acute viral infection, or may follow infection by weeks, months, or longer in recovered patients.”
That germs affect the body is so obvious it is surprising why there isn't wider recognition of their effects on the mind, which include heightened risk of depression, anxiety, crime, impaired scholastic achievement, and slowed reaction time increasing the risk of traffic accidents (1, 2, 3) and less success in certain sports.
- Book: Infectious Madness: The Surprising Science of How We "Catch" Mental Illness
- January 1, 2013: Guns, Germs, and Stealing: Exploring the Link between Infectious Disease and Crime
- June 22, 2020: Does the Punishment Fit the Crime (and Immune System)? A Potential Role for the Immune System in Regulating Punishment Sensitivity
Excerpt: “Together, these results provide evidence of a link between the activities of the immune system and punishment sensitivity, which may have implications for criminal justice outcomes.”
- Sex Differences in the Effect of Inflammation on Subjective Social Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endotoxin in Healthy Young Adults
- June 23, 2020: A brewing storm: The neuropsychological sequelae of hyperinflammation due to COVID-19
Much more often than we realize, problems with our spouses, children, other family, co-workers, bosses, neighbors, and others ultimately result from infectious diseases but even doctors (half of whom graduated in the bottom 50% of their class) usually don't fully grasp this reality. There is no need to wait for additional evidence because we already have plenty indicating that we dearly need a more universal way to reduce the risk of all infectious diseases, not just the latest one hogging our attention. This site introduces you to some of my innovations to minimize infectious disease risk, but I have many others.
As social media came to dominate the United States, we selected for leaders who were politically correct as opposed to correct, leaving us with medical experts who initially advised Americans to avoid masks, then utilize ones made from some of the worst possible materials — then pretending as if perfunctory utilization was fine, then that six feet was enough when it clearly wasn't, then acting as if all COVID-19 vaccines are worth recommending, with all of that following many months of them ignoring several ways to reduce the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection, including the ultimate way: innovations to block airborne germ transmission. Yes, Mr. Edison, there is a better way.
Repeating the admonition by Francis Bacon in 1625: “He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils.”
Easiest pop quiz ever:
Which is correct?
(a) It is better to permit airborne germs to diffuse as they now do and infect people.
(b) It is better to block airborne pathogen transmission so they don't infect people.
I rest my case. Unfortunately, too many experts rest on their laurels, too complacent to burn the midnight oil and generate innovative solutions. Instead, they want us to rely on vaccines we can't rely on. I want much better results.
- October 27, 2021: By the numbers: counting the costs of infectious illness
- October 27, 2021: Uneven attention hampers the drive to control infectious diseases: Despite notable success stories, many conditions still present a complex challenge.
Excerpt: “In 2019, the World Health Organization reports, one-quarter of all deaths worldwide were due to infectious disease.”
- October 27, 2021: The high burden of infectious disease: Human and economic costs highlight the need for fresh approaches in research.
Excerpt: “… the human and economic cost of communicable illness, even before the [COVID-19] pandemic, was stuck somewhere between staggering and incalculable. ”
The need for fresh approaches motivated me years ago to develop a way to jumpstart the early immune response; that technology led to my first patent. The need for fresh approaches incentivized me to develop an alternative to handwashing and hand sanitizers, both of which are fraught with drawbacks. The need for fresh approaches inspired me to develop innovations solving one of the most insurmountable infectious disease challenges: how to avoid inhaling germs recently exhaled by others.
- November 18, 2021: Disease control chief: "All of Germany is one big outbreak"
Excerpt: “Germany has entered a ‘nationwide state of emergency’ because of surging coronavirus infections … regular medical care cannot be guaranteed anymore in some parts of the country because hospitals and intensive care wards are overstretched.”
- November 19, 2021: With COVID cases spiking, no end in sight
- November 19, 2021: Axios: We're still not taking the pandemic seriously
Excerpt: “… institutional inflexibility has left us at risk of further COVID waves and disruption and unprepared for the inevitable next pandemic. … The bottom line: The nearly 800,000 Americans who've died so far from COVID-19 are proof we've lost this pandemic, but if the U.S. finally exits it without fundamental change, it'll be set up to lose the next one.”
Comment: The whack-a-mole approach to infectious diseases is leaving a trail of personal and economic destruction that prompted me to develop new ways to block pathogen transmission via contact as well as the air, as disclosed above. I also developed a device capable of augmenting the early immune response. It works very well for skin and other superficial infections. I suspect that its operative principle could be applied to some deeper infections, but I haven't tested it for that application.
- December 5, 2021: Gottlieb: Variant-specific vaccines 'may not work'
Comment: More evidence that the whack-a-mole approach doesn't work well, and that vaccines in general are a poor tool to control this pandemic.
- December 6, 2021: Next pandemic could be more lethal than COVID, vaccine creator says
- Frank Contacessa November 29, 2021: Time to think beyond the vax? Reflections from a COVID-stricken doc
Excerpt: “Maybe we've put too much faith in the notion that we'd be able to vaccinate our way out of this mess. … There is one more approach that I've heard few people talk about. The one risk factor that has led to more complications and death from COVID is obesity. This has not been talked about enough.”
Comment: Based on the current SARS-CoV-2 variants and vaccines, they will never succeed in giving us our old lives back. My technology could achieve that and slash the rate of other airborne infectious diseases, but America is mired in another epidemic: one of stupidity. Everyone trained in science who can think logically can look at the technology disclosed in this website and realize that it would be highly effective in safeguarding people from airborne pathogens, but so far everyone continues to put their faith in what isn't working well, such as vaccines only 40% effective in blocking transmission, rather than my technology that can block over 99% of airborne pathogens.
I previously developed some nifty solutions to obesity, but the world so blind at spotting good ideas again prefers to focus on what isn't working. Perhaps the root problem isn't stupidity but pessimism making people think that breakthroughs are no longer possible.
- November 20, 2021: Michigan shatters peak COVID-19 case rate. 1 in 10 cases in US are from the state
- December 3, 2021: West Michigan hospitals are full, reporting record numbers of COVID-19 patients
Comment: Masks, social distancing, and vaccines are adding up to a disaster that is bound to get worse. It's high time for Plan B — and I had it available soon after the pandemic began.
- December 3, 2021: ‘We're paralyzed’: Wisconsin hospitals struggle to transfer and place new patients
- December 6, 2021: ‘The picture is getting pretty dark’: NH hospitals buckle under weight of COVID surge
Comment: And it's only the beginning of winter! Hopefully this will help end the myth that masks, social distancing, and vaccines can sufficiently control this pandemic.
- December 6, 2021: Wayne County declares state of emergency as COVID-19 cases spike
- December 7, 2021: A doctor's call to arms: 'Rejoin us on the front line' as pandemic worsens in Michigan
- December 10, 2021: South Korea reports its worst virus surge since pandemic
- December 10, 2021: Vermont college switching to virtual learning due to COVID-19 surge
- December 10, 2021: Psaki: It's OK to let children eat lunch in the cold 'to keep kids safe'
Comment: Why not protect them with my system?
Excerpt: “White House press secretary Jen Psaki suggested Friday that it is OK for kids to eat their lunches outside in cold temperatures in an effort to maintain safety amid the COVID-19 pandemic. … Psaki claimed the 'vast majority of parents appreciate' measures schools are taking to combat COVID-19 …”
Comment: Eating outside in cold weather is a Stone Age solution. I have a 21st century solution.
- December 16, 2021: Health official: Northern Michigan remains hot spot for COVID-19 activity
- January 3, 2022: Michigan schools, flights, businesses grapple with latest COVID-19 surge
- January 19, 2022: COVID and schools: Australia is about to feel the full brunt of its teacher shortage
- November 16, 2021: Georgetown medical professor and immunologist predicts there will be a fully vaccine-resistant COVID variant by the spring: “Sadly, every coronavirus prediction I've made has pretty much come true. I hope I'm wrong this time," the Enochian BioSciences CEO told Fortune.
- November 23, 2021: Coronavirus: former heads of pandemic review panel warn 'the world is losing time'
Excerpt: “Governments are not moving fast enough to end the pandemic or to prevent another one, warned the former heads of an independent body tasked with grading the world on its response to Covid-19.”
- December 8, 2021: Germany records highest daily COVID deaths since February
- December 26, 2021: Iowan dies after a 15-day wait for a medical center bed. His survivors blame the COVID surge
Comment: A Michigan relative recently waited days for a hospital room, then received second-rate care. However, it is difficult to blame staff for problems that originate in the fact that our medical system, as expensive as it is, is not adequately funded to optimally deliver care in good times and is woefully underfunded to deal with crises such as this pandemic.
The ultimate solution is not to throw money at the problem but to better address the root causes of the diseases and conditions that plague us. Prevention is the only viable option, but we live in a world of 8-second attention spans. Few people read about health and hardly any focus on the exposome, which causes or contributes to most health problems. In my upcoming 4000-page mega-book, I make health and even the exposome interesting by sugarcoating it with creative writing and spotlighting topics that interest people, such as sex, brainpower, mood, and appearance because almost everything good for them is conducive to health.
- May 3, 2021: The Doctor Is In, but Scared to See You: Some health care providers, even those already vaccinated, have developed patient hesitancy and are reluctant to leave the comfort of telehealth.
Comment: The fear is understandable yet it is profoundly disappointing that so many physicians haven't yet grasped the ultimate root of this pandemic as well as other airborne diseases: that we inhale air recently exhaled by others. COVID-19 vaccines reduce transmission but not nearly enough. Pretending that those vaccines adequately safeguard us is akin to sprinkling a highly selective antibiotic into your toilet bowl and thinking that the water is safe to drink. Killing one pathogen doesn't protect you from the others — obvious in that example, yet strangely not with this pandemic that is (in late November 2021) again rebounding even in highly vaccinated areas.
Physician fear metastasizes into second-rate care (telemedicine cannot fully substitute for seeing patients in person) yet the fallout isn't limited to that. For example, whenever staff at my local hospital (and likely yours) enter a COVID patient's room, they must first don (apply) protective clothing from head to foot and afterward doff (remove) it, wasting precious time and creating a mountain of waste and expenses. My technology could obviate that need so nurses could zip in and out as quickly as they once did.
- The New York Times November 23, 2021: Despite Vaccines, the U.S. Has Lost More Lives to COVID This Year Than Last
- November 24, 2021: 'False sense of security' around vaccines as Europe again COVID epicentre - WHO
Excerpt: “Europe is once again the epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic amid a "false sense of security" over the protection offered by vaccines, World Health Organisation director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said …”
- November 24, 2021: Vaccines alone are not enough to control COVID spread, WHO warns
Excerpt: “WHO says vaccines reduce COVID-19 transmission by 40%”
Comment: Not nearly good enough. In contrast, my technology can reduce airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens by over 99%.
- January 5, 2022 by Trisha Miller, Chief Innovation and Development Officer at Elevate: Op-Ed: I have COVID – again. Here's what I've learned about getting through the virus.
- December 22, 2021: T-Mobile, Amazon, and others are backing out of CES 2022 amid COVID resurgence: T-Mobile, Nvidia, Amazon, and others are canceling their plans or going virtual.
Comment: Ironic that I have technology the tech giants don't.
- June 22, 2021: The total number and mass of SARS-CoV-2 virions
Excerpt: “Although each infected person carries an estimated 1 billion to 100 billion virions during peak infection, their total mass is no more than 0.1 mg. This curiously implies that all SARS-CoV-2 virions currently in all human hosts have a mass of between 100 g and 10 kg.”
Comment: Ironic that such a small mass has shackled and devastated humanity.
- ↑ risk of COVID-19 + many other diseases (and consequences of them, such as infections triggering mental illness)
- accelerates aging inside and out
- ↑ risk of birth defects
- impairs mood and mental clarity
- contributes to premature cognitive deterioration
My technology minimizes those risks plus:
- saves time: less or no need to vacuum your home
- turns any room into a multi-function gym with zero footprint for equipment
- introduces a new way to have fun
- protects from air pollution
- minimizes CO2 exposure → better thinking
- can safeguard from home intruders (one of countless examples: if news anchor/actress Anne Pressly had this technology, she would still be alive)
Federal government planning for the pandemic to go on for years
During the final presidential debate on October 22, 2020, Joe Biden promised to “shut down the virus.” It is easy to promise but hard to deliver — so hard that he basically gave up by admitting on December 27, 2021 that “there is no federal solution” to the pandemic, and no foreseeable end to it, as evidenced by the federal government awarding on December 29, 2021 a $136.7 million contract to MilliporeSigma to increase domestic production capacity of nitrocellulose membranes: “a critical material used in manufacturing SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests.” However, “the finished product is not scheduled to roll off assembly lines before late 2024.”
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced on October 22, 2021 that it also invested over $560 million “to boost manufacturing of [other] key products needed to increase domestic testing supply.”
These investments signal that the federal government expects the pandemic to drag on for years, reflecting how even multiple vaccines per year will not suffice to free us from the threat of COVID-19.
- December 29, 2021: Our Relationship With COVID Vaccines Is Just Getting Started
Comment: You are about to be turned into a human pincushion, after which even multiple vaccines per year will not suffice to free you from the threat of COVID-19.
- January 22, 2021: COVID-19 will likely be with us forever. Here's how we'll live with it.
- October 27, 2021: How Will We Live if Covid Is Here to Stay?
- January 14, 2022: Video: Chinese COVID-19 patients confined to metal boxes in quarantine camps
Comment: Even these draconian measures cannot stop this pandemic. My technology could if it were widely implemented.
- July 6, 2020: Study of an Air Curtain in the Context of Individual Protection from Exposure to Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Contained in Cough-Generated Fluid Particles (PDF)
- January 15, 2022: Effectiveness of personalized air curtain in reducing exposure to airborne cough droplets
- April 27, 2022: A Study on Flow Field Characteristics and Air Purifier with Barrier Effects (PDF)
- May 17, 2022: Desktop air curtain system prevents spread of COVID-19 in hospital settings: Device suitable for use in hospital wards, blood labs, reception counters
Excerpt: “Researchers have developed a desktop air curtain system that blocks all incoming aerosol particles. An air curtain, or air door, is a fan-powered ventilation system that creates an air seal over an entryway, but one challenge in developing smaller air curtains is fully blocking emitted aerosol particles over time because it is difficult to maintain the air wall over a long distance.”
Comment: No it isn't. Beginning early in 2020, I developed several such systems. Some protect people throughout every square/cubic foot of buildings, and others provide portable protection wherever you go. Initially, it seemed as if the ones providing protection throughout buildings would consume staggering amounts of energy to move the air, as well as otherwise being expensive, but I solved those problems and can, for example, move huge amounts of air at little or no cost. I also developed many innovations and offshoots beyond those described in this article submitted on January 27, 2022 and published online May 17, 2022.
Based on: Blocking effect of desktop air curtain on aerosols in exhaled breath
Clearly, vaccines and other current control measures cannot restore the lives we want, free from disease, fear, and restrictions. But my technology can, and do that very rapidly: flip it on, and seconds later you are protected, not with the 40% efficacy of vaccines but almost complete (> 99%) protection that if widely implemented would instantly result in effective herd immunity and hence a quick end to this disastrous pandemic.
“This is a pandemic in which nearly a million people have died. It is by far the greatest public health danger that this country has faced in the last century. More and more people are dying every day. More and more people are getting sick every day. … And this [vaccination] is the policy that is most geared to stopping all this. There is nothing else that will perform that function better than incentivizing people strongly to vaccinate themselves.”
That isn't true because the efficacy of vaccination is much less than that of my technology.
What will a lifetime of vaccinations and COVID-19 do to people?
The question few ask is: what will a lifetime of vaccinations and COVID-19 do to people? During the Omicron phase, I was infected (in spite of prior vaccinations) and was utterly miserable, with the pain, coughing, and loss of sleep so intolerable I wondered how much longer I could endure the misery. In contrast, a prior infection very early in the pandemic was distinctly different than any “cold” I previously had yet was easily tolerated. During it, I was able to work almost as normal, in contrast with the Omicron phase nightmare that crippled my ability to work, think, and speak. Yet because I wasn't hospitalized, it was considered a “mild” case. Ha!
Benefits of vaccinations (visible in population studies) usually neglect the drawbacks. One of them is shoulder injection site pain so severe it disrupts sleep for a few days in side-sleepers. When I heard people complaining of that, I couldn't believe the discomfort was that objectionable until I experienced it myself. If I were boosted as often as I should be to maintain optimal protection, that would result in a significant loss of sleep, which can trigger other problems.
While we are better off with vaccinations, having them should not undermine efforts to find better ways to prevent infections — something current vaccines do poorly. Fortunately, we already have the technology: my innovations that can almost completely block airborne germ transmission. Unfortunately, the myopic fixation on vaccines has prevented our leaders from focusing on a better solution.
- May 22, 2022: Not taking precautions? Be prepared to get COVID once a year, modeling shows
Comment: And prepare for shorter and more miserable lives with less happiness and prosperity.